Charles Hixson wrote:
[...]
OTOH, it seems far too late in the development process to be inserting such a
change in Python 2.6 or 3.0. If this is important to you, you should
probably propose it for 2.7/3.1.
It's been too late for over three months now, and the suggestions I've
seen so far a
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 19:43, Charles Hixson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore it seems to me that the appropriate thing is to create a convention
> that bar-somethingprintable-bar
And the "something-printable" shows the main flaw of this approach.
Mathematics indeed uses a lot of symbols to
On Saturday 26 July 2008 01:23:17 am Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Sebastien Loisel wrote:
> > However, just for posterity (and I'm not going to pursue the argument
> > further than this), I'll say this. The problem of determining the
> > meaning (or overridability or whatever) of x=4$6 is the same as the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about just making a matrix multiply function that can take many
arguments? I think this is pretty readable:
mmul(a, b, c, d)
The multiplications aren't necessarily all together, e.g.
a*b + c*d + e*f
would become
mmul(a, b) + mmul(c, d) + mmul(e, f)
--
Gre
