Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FWIW, I'm fine with making these methods on float -- a class method
>> float.fromhex(...) echoes e.g. dict.fromkeys(...) and
>> datetime.fromordi
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> To avoid losing these ideas, could you add them to the issue tracker as
> feature requests? It's too late to get them into 2.6/3.0 but they may make
> good additions for the next release cycle.
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:14 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I didn't see any recent discussion about this so I thought I'd ask
>> here: do you think this would make a good addition to the new urllib
>> package?
>
> Just in case that isn't clear: any such change must be delayed
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I'm fine with making these methods on float -- a class method
> float.fromhex(...) echoes e.g. dict.fromkeys(...) and
> datetime.fromordinal(...). The to-hex conversion could be x.hex() --
> we don't tend to use ".
FWIW, I'm fine with making these methods on float -- a class method
float.fromhex(...) echoes e.g. dict.fromkeys(...) and
datetime.fromordinal(...). The to-hex conversion could be x.hex() --
we don't tend to use ".toxyz()" as a naming convention much in Python.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Mar
