Trent Nelson wrote:
> Hurrah, 'x86 W2k8 trunk' has just experienced its first green build
> and test! Thanks to everyone that committed the various patches I
> sent out in such a timely fashion.
>
> Martin, does this mean I can have a slave set up for x64 now? }:>
Versprochen ist versprochen :-)
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
> Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Steve Holden schrieb:
>>> Paul Moore wrote:
On 04/03/2008, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we need a new appendix to the tutorial which goes into detail about
> the CPython interpreter's command line options, environment varia
> I think the best lesson here is Tcl. Because it uses stubs mechanism,
> you don't need to depend on tclXX.dll, you don't deal with really
> direct implementation details, you don't care about runtimes,
> everything is much easier. Maybe it's possible (and not too late) for
> Python to somehow emb
Hurrah, 'x86 W2k8 trunk' has just experienced its first green build and test!
Thanks to everyone that committed the various patches I sent out in such a
timely fashion.
Martin, does this mean I can have a slave set up for x64 now? }:>
Trent.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL
On 3/4/08, Jesus Cea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That said, it is my aim to keep bsddb in stdlib, providing a stable and
> featureful module. I think keeping bsddb development inside python svn
> is not appropiate. Currently (I could change idea), my approach will be
> keeping pybssdb as a separa
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:52 AM, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mingw tends to be rather more stable (though not itself without the
> occasional library compatibility issue), and more freely available.
Not all extensions can be built using mingw (pywin32 comes to mind
immediately). And
I've got a patch in http://bugs.python.org/issue2179 that optimizes
the bytecode generated by a with statement by tucking the
context_manager.__exit__ method onto the stack. It saves 2 opcodes, 8
bytes, and about .5us for each with block at the cost of an extra
stack entry for the duration of the b
Hello to all I am a new member.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Greg Ewing wrote:
> Steven Bethard wrote:
>> Is this mainly a request to use more open source tools? Because if
>> the concern is just cost, Python 2.6 and 3.0 compile with the free
>> Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Express editions.
>
> I don't think it's only about cost, it's about not
> being re
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Is this mainly a request to use more open source tools? Because if
> the concern is just cost, Python 2.6 and 3.0 compile with the free
> Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Express editions.
I don't think it's only about cost, it's about not
being reliant on tools that appear an
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Adam Olsen schrieb:
>
>>Another example is the use of BNF, which although dominant in its
>>field, it provides a steep learning curve for most programmers.
>
> We could of course accompany each BNF-described item with an example.
An alternative to BNF would be syntax diagram
Adam Olsen wrote:
> The term "Displays" is pretty obscure as well,
Hmmm, I'd call them "constructor expressions" or some such.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
ht
> I'm not sure if I should read into the fact that it's occurring after
> networking-oriented tests like test_httplib and test_ftplib. Running
> rt.bat on the resulting build manually doesn't indicate any errors in
> these tests. Have other Windows buildbot owners seen this?
Notice that it also
> That said, it is my aim to keep bsddb in stdlib, providing a stable and
> featureful module. I think keeping bsddb development inside python svn
> is not appropiate.
I think it would be helpful if you could analyze the crashes that bsddb
caused on Windows. Just go back a few revisions in the sub
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > While the patches are appreciated, please submit them to the tracker at
> > bugs.python.org rather than mailing them directly to this list.
>
> This comment doesn't apply to your recent posts - look
Mike Meyer wrote:
> I think lxml is the best Python XML library that meets his
> requirements, and it would make my life a lot easier if it were part
> of the standard library.
+1 (!)
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Trent Nelson schrieb:
> Had a chat with some Twisted/buildbot folk and they can confirm
> they've seen it as well on Windows. They've given me a few things to
> look into. Out of interest, how are you running your buildbot? Via
> the command line in an interactive desktop session, as a service,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Facundo Batista
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/3/5, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> (Bringing this from python-ideas, Guido is talking about PEP 3135)
>
>
> > Ehhh! The PEP's "reference implementation" is useless and probably
> > doesn't even work. T
Had a chat with some Twisted/buildbot folk and they can confirm they've seen it
as well on Windows. They've given me a few things to look into. Out of
interest, how are you running your buildbot? Via the command line in an
interactive desktop session, as a service, or as a scheduled task, or
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:01:14 +1300 Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > Trying to install it from the repository is a PITA, because
> > it uses both the easyinstall and Pyrex
>
> It shouldn't depend on Pyrex as long as it's distributed
> with the generated C files. If it'
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Ned Deily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:42:49 + (UTC) Medhat Gayed
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > lxml is good but not written in python and difficult to
Trent Nelson schrieb:
> I've started to see my build slave dying every so often with a
> twisted error half way through tests: ... test_htmlparser
> test_httplib
>
> remoteFailed: [Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames):
> twisted.internet.error.ConnectionLost: Connection to the oth
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Steve Holden schrieb:
>> Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On 04/03/2008, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we need a new appendix to the tutorial which goes into detail about
the CPython interpreter's command line options, environment variables
and details on what
Facundo Batista wrote:
> 2008/3/5, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> (Bringing this from python-ideas, Guido is talking about PEP 3135)
>
>> Ehhh! The PEP's "reference implementation" is useless and probably
>> doesn't even work. The actual implementation is completely different.
>> If
2008/3/5, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
(Bringing this from python-ideas, Guido is talking about PEP 3135)
> Ehhh! The PEP's "reference implementation" is useless and probably
> doesn't even work. The actual implementation is completely different.
> If you want to help, a rewrite of the
Trent Nelson wrote:
> winsound.Beep fails for me on the 'x86 2k8 trunk' build slave, which
> is a virtual Windows Server 2008 instance running under Hyper-V. Not
> surprisingly, there's not a single audio-related device on this
> system. The attached patch to test_winsound.py incorporates the
> _
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> While the patches are appreciated, please submit them to the tracker at
> bugs.python.org rather than mailing them directly to this list.
This comment doesn't apply to your recent posts - looks like those have
all been checked in already ;)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
27 matches
Mail list logo
