On Jan 10, 2008 8:01 AM, Joseph Armbruster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not a developer but i'm interested in browsing it. Is it
> possible to be added?
Yes, I've added you to the list. I'll probably send the list off
tomorrow, so let me know if you would like to be added.
n
--
>
>
> On Ja
Reed O'Brien wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008, at 1:48 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
>> -On [20080108 17:07], Christian Heimes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> Python's _winreg module and pywin32 expose several functions to
>>> get the paths from the registry but I don't think it has a simple
>>>
At 12:08 AM 1/11/2008 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > Yes, that's the general idea. But what happens if you are in the middle
> > of firing hooks for 'a', and a new hook for 'a.b.c' is added? What
> > about a new hook for 'a'?
>
>If 'a' registers a new hook for a child o
At 01:47 AM 1/11/2008 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > At 11:45 PM 1/10/2008 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
> >> In my version a hook is immediately called when the the registry value
> >> is set to None. When a hook is registered for a module during the
> >> execution of t
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 11:45 PM 1/10/2008 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
>> In my version a hook is immediately called when the the registry value
>> is set to None. When a hook is registered for a module during the
>> execution of the callback then the hook is fired directly and not after
>> t
At 11:45 PM 1/10/2008 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
>In my version a hook is immediately called when the the registry value
>is set to None. When a hook is registered for a module during the
>execution of the callback then the hook is fired directly and not after
>the existing hooks are called. Is
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Yes, that's the general idea. But what happens if you are in the middle
> of firing hooks for 'a', and a new hook for 'a.b.c' is added? What
> about a new hook for 'a'?
If 'a' registers a new hook for a child of 'a' (e.g. 'a.b.c' or 'a.f')
then the new hooks are called wi
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>> I'm not setting the hooks to Py_None before the hook are called.
Err, make that NOW, not NOT ... stupid typo.
I'm NOW setting the hooks to Py_None before the hooks are called.
> That's fine, but here's a different catch: are you iterating over the
> hooks by taking the
Hi everyone,
Some time ago I've stumbled upon a problem with compiling py2exe with
mingw: it resulted in invalid executable run.exe. At first I dismissed
it as some very strange problem, but recently I decided to look into
it again and found that the reason for this is a .def file, supplied
during
At 09:40 PM 1/10/2008 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>[...]
>
> > There's also one twist that I haven't sorted out yet: "Importing"
> > guarantees that a parent module 'foo' will have a 'bar' attribute for
> > the 'foo.bar' module, if 'foo.bar' is lazy. It does this by
> > r
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
[...]
> There's also one twist that I haven't sorted out yet: "Importing"
> guarantees that a parent module 'foo' will have a 'bar' attribute for
> the 'foo.bar' module, if 'foo.bar' is lazy. It does this by
> registering a callback, ideally *before* any other callback is
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 9:57 AM, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Eric Smith wrote:
>>> 1: How should the builtin format() work? It takes 2 parameters, an
>>> object o and a string s, and returns o.__format__(s). If s is None, it
>>> returns o.__format__(empty_string).
On Jan 10, 2008 9:57 AM, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Smith wrote:
> > (I'm posting to python-dev, because this isn't strictly 3.0 related.
> > Hopefully most people read it in addition to python-3000).
> >
> > I'm working on backporting the changes I made for PEP 3101 (Advanced
> >
Eric Smith wrote:
> (I'm posting to python-dev, because this isn't strictly 3.0 related.
> Hopefully most people read it in addition to python-3000).
>
> I'm working on backporting the changes I made for PEP 3101 (Advanced
> String Formatting) to the trunk, in order to meet the pre-PyCon release
>
At 10:47 AM 1/10/2008 +, Paul Moore wrote:
>On 09/01/2008, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The idea that users would /program their own computers/ was totally
> > alien to the Windows mindset.
>
>Actually, the alien idea is that more than one person would use the
>same (Windows) com
At 07:22 PM 1/10/2008 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>Christian Heimes wrote:
> > A module is successfully loaded
> > '''
> >
> > The import machinery checks if sys.post_import_hooks contains post import
> > hooks for the newly loaded module. If hooks are found then the hook
I am not a developer but i'm interested in browsing it. Is it
possible to be added?
On Jan 10, 2008 10:57 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
> > I think only Coverity can add people. You can send them a message if
> > you would like to be added: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> I think only Coverity can add people. You can send them a message if
> you would like to be added: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or you can send
> mail to me and I can forward along all the people that would like to
> be added.
>
> I'll wait a few days to collect names so I can batch u
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> For traceback.c, namebuf defined on line 155 should be moved out one
> block since filename is an alias to namebuf and it is used outside the
> current scope. I think this is unlikely to be a problem in practice,
> but is technically wrong and should be fixed.
Agreed, the ea
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 2008-01-10 14:31, Eric Smith wrote:
>> (I'm posting to python-dev, because this isn't strictly 3.0 related.
>> Hopefully most people read it in addition to python-3000).
>>
>> I'm working on backporting the changes I made for PEP 3101 (Advanced
>> String Formatting) to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 10, 2008, at 9:07 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 2008-01-10 14:31, Eric Smith wrote:
>> (I'm posting to python-dev, because this isn't strictly 3.0 related.
>> Hopefully most people read it in addition to python-3000).
>>
>> I'm working on backp
On 2008-01-10 14:31, Eric Smith wrote:
> (I'm posting to python-dev, because this isn't strictly 3.0 related.
> Hopefully most people read it in addition to python-3000).
>
> I'm working on backporting the changes I made for PEP 3101 (Advanced
> String Formatting) to the trunk, in order to meet th
(I'm posting to python-dev, because this isn't strictly 3.0 related.
Hopefully most people read it in addition to python-3000).
I'm working on backporting the changes I made for PEP 3101 (Advanced
String Formatting) to the trunk, in order to meet the pre-PyCon release
date for 2.6a1.
I have a few
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> For mmapmodule.c, fd should be checked for -1 before calling stat on line
> 1064.
On looking at this, it doesn't seem like an actual problem. fstat(-1,
...) returns a -1 and errno is set to EBADF, 'bad file descriptor'.
/*
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> For mmapmodule.c, fd should be checked for -1 before calling stat on line
> 1064.
I'll fix the mmap problem.
--amk
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/
On 09/01/2008, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea that users would /program their own computers/ was totally
> alien to the Windows mindset.
Actually, the alien idea is that more than one person would use the
same (Windows) computer. Not surprising as these were *personal*
computer
Christian Heimes wrote:
> A module is successfully loaded
> '''
>
> The import machinery checks if sys.post_import_hooks contains post import
> hooks for the newly loaded module. If hooks are found then the hooks are
> called in the order they were registered with the m
Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've taken a look at some bugs in the bugtracker. I think these should
> be closed:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue1720992 is about automatic imports.
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue1448325
> and
> http://bugs.python.org/issue1566086
>
> is about the regular exp
28 matches
Mail list logo
