On 11/2/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2-Nov-07, at 6:57 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Since people are already jumping on those bugs but nobody has voiced
> > an opinion on your own patch, let me say that I think it's a good
> > patch, and I want it in 2.6, but I'm reluctant to
On 2-Nov-07, at 6:57 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> Since people are already jumping on those bugs but nobody has voiced
> an opinion on your own patch, let me say that I think it's a good
> patch, and I want it in 2.6, but I'm reluctant to add it to 2.5.2 as
> it goes well beyond a bugfix (addin
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (10/26/07 - 11/02/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1315 open (+15) / 11541 closed (+21) / 12856 total (+36)
Open issues with patches: 417
Average durati
On 11/2/07, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Fred Drake wrote:
> >>@property
> >>def attribute(self):
> >>return 42
> >>
> >>@property.set
> >>def attribute(self, value):
> >>self._ignored =
On 10/31/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue1663329 details an annoyance in the
> subprocess module that has affected several users, including me.
> Essentially, closing hundreds of thousands of file descriptors by
> round-tripping through the python excep
Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fred Drake wrote:
>>@property
>>def attribute(self):
>>return 42
>>
>>@property.set
>>def attribute(self, value):
>>self._ignored = value
>
> Hmmm... if you were allowed general lvalues as the target
Mike Klaas wrote:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue1705170: reproduced. Conjecture as to
> why it is occurring, but I don't know the guts well enough to propose
> a decent fix.
I've fixed this on the trunk (I'm afraid I have no opinion on the patch
you're interested in though.
Neal - where do
