Which is correct?
$ egrep '(False|True)' Doc/lib/*.tex | grep -c \\constant{
74
$ egrep '(False|True)' Doc/lib/*.tex | grep -c \\code{
204
$ egrep 'None' Doc/lib/*.tex | grep -c \\code{
512
$ egrep 'None' Doc/lib/*.tex | grep -c \\constant{
83
n
___
Pyt
> Just curious why 2to3 would not replace range() with list(range())?
In most usages of range(), using the 3.0 range() will work just as
well, and be more efficient.
If I wanted to write code that works in both versions (which I
understand is not the 2to3 objective), then I would use range().
If
Part of the problem might be that we are using an old version of svn
(1.1) AFAIK. IIRC these operations were sped up in later versions.
n
--
On 5/8/07, Kristján Valur Jónsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello there.
>
> Does anyone know why getting the SVN logs for a project is so excru
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:33:22PM +, Kristj?n Valur J?nsson wrote:
>Does anyone know why getting the SVN logs for a project is so
>excruciatingly slow?
>
>Is this an inherent SVN problem or are the python.org servers simply
>overloaded?
I believe it's because there are multip
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [+python-3000; replies please remove python-dev]
>
> On 5/5/07, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Saturday 05 May 2007, Aahz wrote:
>>> > I'm with MAL and Fred on making literals immutable -- that's safe a
Hello there.
Does anyone know why getting the SVN logs for a project is so excruciatingly
slow?
Is this an inherent SVN problem or are the python.org servers simply overloaded?
It takes something like 10 minutes for me to get the log messages window up for
the root
of a branch.
Cheers,
Kristján
On May 8, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:14:02AM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
>> I'd like to suggest that we remove all (or nearly all) uses of
>> xrange from the stdlib. A quick scan shows that most of the usage
>> of it is unnecessary. With it going away in 3.0,
On 5/8/07, Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:14:02AM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest that we remove all (or nearly all) uses of
> > xrange from the stdlib. A quick scan shows that most of the usage
> > of it is unnecessary. With it going away in
Hi Anthony,
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:14:02AM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that we remove all (or nearly all) uses of
> xrange from the stdlib. A quick scan shows that most of the usage
> of it is unnecessary. With it going away in 3.0, and it being
> informally deprecate
Mark Hammond wrote:
> Please add my -1 to the chorus here, for the same reasons already expressed.
Another -1 here - while I agree there are benefits to removing backslash
continuations and string literal concatenation, I don't think they're
significant enough to justify the hassle of making it
10 matches
Mail list logo
