[Guido]
>> The ints aren't really embedded in Decimal, so we don't have to do
>> that there (but we could).
[Facundo Batista]
> -0.
>
> If we can't achieve it without disturbing the rest of Python, I'll try
> as much as possible to keep what the Spec proposes.
Which "Spec"? For example, floor di
[Guido]
>> That really sucks, especially since the whole point of making int
>> division return a float was to make the integers embedded in the
>> floats... I think the best solution would be to remove the definition
>> of % (and then also for divmod()) for floats altogether, deferring to
>> math.
[Guido]
> ...
> So you are proposing that Decimal also rip out the % and // operators
> and __divmod__? WFM, but I don't know what Decimal users say (I'm not
> one).
Yes: it's just as much a floating type as HW binary floats, and all
the same issues come up. For example, decimal floats are just
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> For Python 2.5, for compatibility, it probably has to remain
> where it is, and only PyTraceBack_Here should stop using it.
> As a consequence, a generator .send() makes exceptions
> occur in the current thread, not in the thread where the
> generator was created.
>
> W
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> The ints aren't really embedded in Decimal, so we don't have to do
> that there (but we could).
-0.
If we can't achieve it without disturbing the rest of Python, I'll try
as much as possible to keep what the Spec proposes.
Regards,
--
. Facundo
.
Blog: http://www.t
Georg Brandl schrieb:
> Do I miss something here, or is the buildbot hit by spammers now?
It looks like it is. If that continues, we have to disable the web
triggers.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.o
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That really sucks, especially since the whole point of making int
> division return a float was to make the integers embedded in the
> floats... I think the best solution would be to remove the definition
> of % (and then also for divmod())
On 1/22/07, Michael Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Bug #1579370 reports a crash when accessing the thread state of
> > a terminated thread, when releasing a generator object.
> >
> > In analysing the problem, I found that f_tstate doesn't hav
On 1/21/07, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Tim]
> >> It's just a fact that different definitions of mod are most useful
> >> most often depending on data type. Python's is good for integers and
> >> often sucks for floats. The C99 and `decimal` definition(s) is/are
> >> good for floats
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bug #1579370 reports a crash when accessing the thread state of
> a terminated thread, when releasing a generator object.
>
> In analysing the problem, I found that f_tstate doesn't have much
> utility: it is used in very few places, and in these pla
10 matches
Mail list logo
