Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> given that urllib2 already supports partial requests, I'm not sure I see
>> the point of reimplementing this on top of httplib. an example:
>>
>>import urllib2
>>
>>request = urllib2.Request("http://www.pythonware.com/daily/index.htm";)
>>request.add_header(
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:30:00AM +0100, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
> If you add protocol-specifics to urllib, the abstraction that urllib
> provides goes away, and you are better off (IMO) to use the underlying
> protocol library in the first place.
IMO you better don't because urllib2 provides
Dear Python developers,
while the JVM is opened to support dynamically typed languages [1] I
wonder if the CPyVM could not show more openness to statically typed
languages? Hereby I don't think that much about arbitrary languages for
the CPyVM but sublanguages like RPython which are "static eno
Fredrik Lundh schrieb:
> given that urllib2 already supports partial requests, I'm not sure I see
> the point of reimplementing this on top of httplib. an example:
>
>import urllib2
>
>request = urllib2.Request("http://www.pythonware.com/daily/index.htm";)
>request.add_header("range
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I've just been putting together a podcasting doodad and have included
>> resuming
>> support in it. Is this something that's already in the pipeline or should I
>> abstract it out to urllib and submit a patch?
>
> Not sure where you got the impression that 206 is "res
Daniel Watkins schrieb:
> I've just been putting together a podcasting doodad and have included
> resuming
> support in it. Is this something that's already in the pipeline or should I
> abstract it out to urllib and submit a patch?
Not sure where you got the impression that 206 is "resume"; in
On 12/12/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I just found out (after everyone else probably :-) that YouTube is
> almost entirely written in Python. (And now I can rub shoulders with
> the developers since they're all Googlers now... :-)
That'll put to bed any "Does Python scale"
And I just found out (after everyone else probably :-) that YouTube is
almost entirely written in Python. (And now I can rub shoulders with
the developers since they're all Googlers now... :-)
On 12/12/06, Kurt B. Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
"Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The Rails buzz seems to be jumping to Python lately.
>
> fwiw, the people I see pick up Python haven't even heard of Ruby or
> Rails (not every- one is doing web 2.0 stuff, after all).
Yes, separate but related groups and issues.
MIT's adopting Pyth
Dan> I've just been putting together a podcasting doodad and have
Dan> included resuming support in it. Is this something that's already
Dan> in the pipeline or should I abstract it out to urllib and submit a
Dan> patch?
Check urllib2 before putting any effort into extending urlli
Hi guys,
I've just been putting together a podcasting doodad and have included resuming
support in it. Is this something that's already in the pipeline or should I
abstract it out to urllib and submit a patch?
Dan
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-De
Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
> "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Just because in the past the ratio of downloads for a particular
>> version was always about 70% Windows vs. 30% source. Now it seems
>> closer to 90/10.
>
> Going mainstream :-))
>
> The Rails buzz seems to be jumping t
Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
> Going mainstream :-))
indeed. from what I can tell on my local market, we've "crossed the chasm"
[1], and
are seeing wider range of "pragmatists" adding Python to the tool chain.
> The Rails buzz seems to be jumping to Python lately.
fwiw, the people I see pick up Pyth
13 matches
Mail list logo