Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 372 open ( -7) / 2980 closed (+12) / 3352 total ( +5)
Bugs: 908 open ( -2) / 5395 closed (+11) / 6303 total ( +9)
RFE : 200 open ( +0) / 191 closed ( +0) / 391 total ( +0)
New / Reopened Patches
__
CodeConte
Adam Olsen wrote:
> On 11/26/05, Noam Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [...stuff about using Ref() for identity dictionaries...]
>
> I too have thought along these lines, but I went one step further.
> There is an existing function that could be modified to produce Ref
> objects: id().
>
>
On 11/26/05, Noam Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...stuff about using Ref() for identity dictionaries...]
I too have thought along these lines, but I went one step further.
There is an existing function that could be modified to produce Ref
objects: id().
Making id() into a type allows it
Noam Raphael wrote:
> Three weeks ago, I read this and thought, "well, you have two options
> for a default comparison, one based on identity and one on value, both
> are useful sometimes and Guido prefers identity, and it's OK." But
> today I understood that I still think otherwise.
>
well, this
Noam Raphael wrote:
> I would greatly appreciate repliers that find a tiny bit of reason in
> what I said (even if they don't agree), and not deny it all as a
> complete load of rubbish.
I don't understand what your message is. With this posting, did you
suggest that somebody does something spe
Three weeks ago, I read this and thought, "well, you have two options
for a default comparison, one based on identity and one on value, both
are useful sometimes and Guido prefers identity, and it's OK." But
today I understood that I still think otherwise.
In two sentences: sometimes you wish to c
I tried removing the CVS repository from SF; it turns
out that this operation is not supported. Instead, it
is only possible to remove it from the project page;
pserver and ssh access remain indefinitely, as does
viewcvs.
The recommended procedure is to place a file into
the repository indicating
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
[...]
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/python/python/dist/src/Misc/README.valgrind?view=markup
The up-to-date version of that (from SVN instead of old CVS repository) is
here:
http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Misc/README.valgrind?view=markup
Hi,
don't know if this is known here, but it seems we have quite a long way to go:
http://kuerzer.de/python3
Reinhold
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pytho
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Paul Jimenez wrote:
> It is my assertion that urlparse is currently broken. Specifically, I
> think that urlparse breaks an abstraction boundary with ill effect.
[...]
I have some comments, but I can't see a patch on SF. Did you post it?
John
_
10 matches
Mail list logo
