[Guido]
> >Yes, the generator does clear its f_back when it's suspended.
[Phillip]
> I realize this won't fix all your worries; I just want to rule out
> this one *particular* form of cycle as a possibility; i.e., to show
> that mere reference to a generator-iterator in a frame does not
> create a
> If Raymond would rather defer to me, I can give it a shot in a revised
> version of PEP 343,
Thanks, that would be great. The decimal conversation used up a lot of
my available cycles.
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http
At 12:03 PM 5/31/2005 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>Yes, the generator does clear its f_back when it's suspended.
I realize this won't fix all your worries; I just want to rule out this one
*particular* form of cycle as a possibility; i.e., to show that mere
reference to a generator-iterator i
[Guido]
> >uncertainty of the possibility to call close() from the
> >destructor may have slowed that down.
[Phillip]
> If you're talking about the bit about __del__ not working when hanging off
> a cycle, my apologies for creating that confusion, I misunderstood Tim's post.
No, I'm not talking a
At 11:12 AM 5/31/2005 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>uncertainty of the possibility to call close() from the
>destructor may have slowed that down.
If you're talking about the bit about __del__ not working when hanging off
a cycle, my apologies for creating that confusion, I misunderstood Tim's
[Brett C.]
> > Been rather quite around here lately so I just wanted to do a quick check to
> > see what the status is on PEPs 342 and 343. I noticed Nick's PEP is still
> > not
> > up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh,
> > Nick? =)
[Nick Coghlan]
> Something
There should be some greater care exercised in closing old bugs.
Marking them "deprecated" and then erasing them is only a good strategy
if we have no means of reproducing the error or ascertaining what the OP
was talking about.
For instance, in www.python.org/sf/640553 , it was possible for a
re
Brett C. wrote:
> Facundo Batista wrote:
>
>>On 5/30/05, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>While we can't (and shouldn't) delete categories, we can change the text used
>>>to describe them. So "Python 2.2.2" can become "Python 2.2.2
>>>(unmaintained)". Whether this is des
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> [Reinhold Birkenfeld]
>> would anybody mind if I was given permissions on the tracker and CVS,
> for
>> fixing small
>> things like bug #1202475. I feel that I can help you others out a bit
> with
>> this and
>> I promise I won't change the interpreter to accept braces...
