Jim Jewett wrote:
Gareth McCaughan wrote:
Some bit of my brain is convinced that [x in stuff if condition]
is the Right Syntax and keeps making me type it even though
I know it doesn't work.
(and I agree with Gareth)
On Monday 2005-03-14 12:42, Eric Nieuwland wrote:
The full syntax is:
[ f(x) for
At 07:55 PM 3/28/05 -0500, Jack Diederich wrote:
For compelling, I think the code smell put off by the "no conflict" metaclass
generator recipe (which also appeared in Alex Martelli's PyCon talk) is fairly
compelling from a duck typing point of view.
# would you rather
class K:
__metaclass__ = no
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:36:08PM -0800, Josiah Carlson wrote:
>
> Eric Nieuwland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Given the ideas so far, would it possible to:
> >
> > def meta(cls):
> > ...
> >
> > @meta
> > class X(...):
> > ...
>
> It is not implemented in Python 2.4. From what
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:25:18AM -0800, Michael Chermside wrote:
> Josiah Carlson writes:
>
> [... stuff about reST and TeX ...]
> > While I have not used it often, I have done the equivalent of decorating
> > classes; it is as natural (though perhaps not quite as useful initially)
> > as d
| > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:36:41AM -0300, Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
| > > Edit libwebbrowser.tex as you see fit, then send it to me
| > > and I'll TeXify it back to you.
| >
| >Uploaded to http://python.org/sf/754022 . I am not a native English
| > speaker, and this is the fi
Michael Chermside wrote:
Josiah Carlson writes:
...While I have not used it often, I have done the equivalent of decorating
classes; it is as natural (though perhaps not quite as useful initially)
as decorating functions,
But a few *good* use cases would change my mind.
Until this weekend, I really
Michael Chermside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Josiah Carlson writes:
>
> [... stuff about reST and TeX ...]
> > While I have not used it often, I have done the equivalent of decorating
> > classes; it is as natural (though perhaps not quite as useful initially)
> > as decorating function
Josiah Carlson writes:
[... stuff about reST and TeX ...]
> While I have not used it often, I have done the equivalent of decorating
> classes; it is as natural (though perhaps not quite as useful initially)
> as decorating functions,
[... stuff about ice cream and sprinkles ...]
Hmm...
[Tim]
> For contrast, here's one that doesn't use frexp(), and is probably
> faster because of that; internally, len(sums) probably won't exceed 5
> in real life (but could get as large as 2K for pathological inputs,
> spanning fp's full dynamic range):
>
> def summer4(iterable):
> sums = [0.0
Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
This change has broken the build on FreeBSD 4.x for me:
gcc -pthread -c -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -
I. -I./Include -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o Python/thread.o Python/thread.c
In file included from Python/thread.c:101:
Python/thread_pthread.h:19:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Python
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv25872
Modified Files:
Tag: release24-maint
thread_pthread.h
Log Message:
Patch #1163249 - Correctly handle _POSIX_SEMAPHORES == -1 to mean no
support for posix sem
11 matches
Mail list logo
