Can people stay off the release23-maint branch while
we cut 2.3.5 (final), starting in about 5 hours time (say,
around 1200 UTC).
Thanks,
Anthony
--
Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
___
Python-Dev m
The most recent test_codecs check-in (1.19) is failing on a MSCV6.0
compilation running on WinMe:
--
Ran 35 tests in 1.430s
FAILED (failures=1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "\py25\lib\test\test_codecs.py", line 786,
> Reduce the usage of the types module.
> Index: xmlrpclib.py
> ===
> RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Lib/xmlrpclib.py,v
# Notes:
# this version is designed to work with Python 2.1 or newer.
> -dispatch[IntType
> Any objections to replacing the likes of types.IntType and
> types.ListType with int and list?
I presume in isinstance tests etc.? In general the procedure for
modernizing source code is not to touch it unless you're reviewing or
editing the whole module (or at least part of it) anyway.
This wo
Raymond> Any objections to replacing the likes of types.IntType and
Raymond> types.ListType with int and list?
+1
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mai
On 2005 Feb 06, at 19:42, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Modified Files:
Tag: release23-maint
test_copy.py
Log Message:
fix bug 1114776
Don't forget release24-maint.
Done -- but the maintenance branch of 2.4 has a problem right now: it
doesn't pass unit tests, specifically test_os (I check
A Debian user pointed out (http://bugs.debian.org/293932), that the
current license for the Python profiler is not conforming to the DFSG
(Debian free software guidelines).
http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/node829.html states
"This permission is explicitly restricted to the copying and
m
