Re: [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs

2018-01-15 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hi Brett, Stability doesn't appear to be a problem, but we have much less parallelism on AppVeyor than we do on Travis-CI. This may make waiting times longer than they used to be. Apparently 3.6 builds (and perhaps 2.7) trigger two sequential AppVeyor jobs: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/pytho

Re: [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs

2018-01-15 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 14:42 Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hi Brett, > > Stability doesn't appear to be a problem, but we have much less > parallelism on AppVeyor than we do on Travis-CI. This may make waiting > times longer than they used to be. > > Apparently 3.6 builds (and perhaps 2.7) trigger t

Re: [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs

2018-01-15 Thread Steve Dower
Python 3 runs builds against the old MSVC (14.0) and the current one (14.1). I’m happy to fully drop support for the older one and remove those builds, but there was a bit of push back when first proposed. (Both toolsets produce binary compatible outputs, but the newer one has better library/com