[issue23955] Add python.ini file for embedded/applocal installs

Changes by Thomas Kluyver : -- nosy: +takluyver ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue23955> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue23955] Add python.ini file for embedded/applocal installs

Thomas Kluyver added the comment: Relative paths would be nice for Pynsist - I would prefer to create the config file at build time and then install it along with the other files. If it needed absolute paths, then the installer would have to write the config file after the user selects the

[issue23342] run() - unified high-level interface for subprocess

Thomas Kluyver added the comment: I expect this can be closed now, unless there's some post-commit review somewhere that needs addressing? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/is

[issue23955] Add python.ini file for embedded/applocal installs

Thomas Kluyver added the comment: Would that option be the only thing that needs to be set to make Python app-local? I'm not familiar with what lives in pyvenv.cfg. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/is

[issue16544] Add external link to ast docs

Thomas Kluyver added the comment: Here's a simple patch that links to Green Tree Snakes from the ast module docs, using the 'sidebar' directive (that's what the logging module uses to link to tutorials, which seemed analogous). I'm still happy to contribute these

[issue28384] hmac cannot be used with shake algorithms

Changes by Thomas Kluyver : -- nosy: +takluyver ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue28384> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue28528] Pdb.checkline()

New submission from Thomas Kluyver: Pdb.checkline() does a hasattr() check to protect against self.curframe not existing. self.curframe can also be None (if self.forget() or self.reset() was called), but checkline() does not handle this. The attached patch treats self.curframe == None as

[issue27050] Demote run() below the high level APIs in subprocess docs

Thomas Kluyver added the comment: I still feel that having one function with various options is easier to explain than three separate functions with awkward names and limited use cases (e.g. no capturing output without checking the exit code). The tweeter you replied to said he didn't

<    1   2   3