Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +24300
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25580
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Stéphane Wirtel :
Thank you for your contribution but as you know, you have to sign the CLA.
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25581#issuecomment-826150064
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
resolution: -> rejected
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi Berker,
No problem, that was just a question/suggestion, and I fully understand your
remarks.
Thanks for your feedback.
Stéphane
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
versions: +Python 3.11, Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44040>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
versions: +Python 3.11 -Python 3.10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33927>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
New changeset bc8b93c9a9fd4faf942cdbaba3e1e0440c594e28 by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.9':
bpo-44040: Update broken link in pathlib source (GH-25905) (GH-25911)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bc8b93c9a9fd4faf942cdbaba3e1e0
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
New changeset ce4fee210bb604726e5da0ff15952a60c2098f88 by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.10':
bpo-44040: Update broken link in pathlib source (GH-25905) (GH-25910)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/ce4fee210bb604726e5da0ff15952a
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Thank you for your contribution, I have merged your PR in main and backported
to 3.10 (future stable) and 3.9 (bugfix).
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi @Christian,
When you have time for my last question.
Thank you,
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Thank you for your contribution
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36928>
___
___
Python-bug
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi @owenchia
Thanks for your contribution!
The project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed
the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).
CLA: https://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/
Could you create a PR on Github with your
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Thank you for your report
--
assignee: -> docs@python
components: +Documentation
nosy: +docs@python, matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +easy
title: Fix 3.3.3.1 Metaclasses Documentation -> [Good first issue] Fix 3.3.3.1
Metaclasses Documentation
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
just one question, I don't find the paragraph with this text in the code. Could
you share the link of this paragraph? Thank you
--
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Found here: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#metaclasses
Thank you
--
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
If you want to modify the text, please create a PR for this file:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst#metaclasses
Don't forget to sign the CLA,
Thank you
--
___
P
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi Aprila,
I think you should use the mailing list for the Python users.
Have a nice day,
--
nosy: +matrixise
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracke
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Here is the mailing list for the python users.
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +13399
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
pull_requests: -13393
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36799>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi Paul,
I have added your PR at this issue, it was assigned to another bpo issue.
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
pull_requests: -13400
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36799>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
unzip index_tuple.zip -x
Archive: index_tuple.zip
caution: zipfile comment truncated
error [index_tuple.zip]: missing 3992977728 bytes in zipfile
(attempting to process anyway)
skipping: zipfile_extract/unsupported compression method 211
I
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi,
Thank you for your report
1. but do you have the bz2 lib on your system, because without that, Python is
not compiled with the support of this format.
2. your file seems to have an issue.
unzip attr0.zip
Archive: attr0.zip
inflating
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
I also recommend that you read this document about the compilation and
installation of Python and its dependencies.
https://devguide.python.org/setup/#compile-and-build
Thank you
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi,
Thank you for your report
but do you have the lzma lib on your system, because without that, Python is
not compiled with the support of this format.
example, with a debian docker image:
without all the needed libraries you would get this exception
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Thank you, I have added Serhiy and Thomas for this issue but I have removed the
versions 3.7, 3.6, 3.5 and 2.7.
Maybe it's a new feature for the next versions of Python.
--
nosy: +matrixise, serhiy.storchaka, twouters
versions: -Python 2.7, P
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
components: +Windows -Library (Lib)
nosy: +paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi Soumya,
But Py_Initialize and Py_Finalize are not called in this case, and it's not a
bug of CPython.
I suggest you read this link:
https://docs.python.org/3/extending/embedding.html#very-high-level-embedding
Thank you
--
nosy: +matr
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi Grant,
Thank you for your bug report,
Would you interested to propose a Pull Request for a fix? You can read the
devguide for more info https://devguide.python.org/
Thank you
--
nosy: +matrixise
title: fileinput module should document that
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +easy
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37014>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
pull_requests: +13546
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/11768
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
@barry
the 3 PR have been merged, do you think we could close this issue?
Thank you
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
@sanky8793 please, use the python-list for that
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thank you
--
nosy: +matrixise -gvanrossum
priority: normal -> low
stage: -> resolved
status: open -&g
New submission from Stéphane Wirtel:
Hi all,
Since I use the last version of Fedora 26 with gcc-7.1.1, I have these warnings
(see output.txt file)
We could add -Wimplicit-fallthrough=0 to Makefile ? it will disable the
fallthrough of the coed.
What do you think about that ? What's
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
@gwk no problem for a review of your patch
@haypo as discussed before, maybe we could remove the lltrace feature because
this one is never used by the developers.
or we could ask on @python-dev ML.
If there is a better solution and this one could replace
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
@stefan
In fact I could create the PR for the backports, but I have again the same
issues for the rest of CPython.
I have checked your code, and in my case 'gcc' is in the cc string, 'gcc
-pthread' and you have fixed for libmpdec.
But f
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
fixed, I am going to push my branch
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31029>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
pull_requests: +2915
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31029>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Serhiy you are free to merge my PR, and I will do the backport for 3.6
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
yep, currently, 3.6 and 3.5 are in 'bug fix' mode, and in this case, it's not a
bug.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
New submission from Stéphane Wirtel:
Last commit on master
commit ccfdb60af7b2db578c1aceb7742cec033077 (HEAD -> master,
upstream/master, upstream/HEAD)
Fedora 26
openssl-libs-1.1.0f-7.fc26.x86_64
openssl-devel-1.1.0f-7.fc26.x86_64
openssl-1.1.0f-7.fc26.x86_64
```
Run tests sequentia
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Dear Christian,
Have you found a solution for this issue ?
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
you could use gdb or pdb for the debugging.
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31033>
___
___
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Stefan, ask on python-dev ml, or we have to ask to Ned Deily for this version ?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
I am not for a backport, it's not a security fix or a bug fix.
for my case, I just want to "kill" the warnings, maybe we could check the
version of gcc and add "-Wimplicit-fallthrough=0".
Here is a good explanation of the &#x
Changes by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31036>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
could you be more explicit? which section ?
Thank you
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
blurb should be only used when there is a release of python, and in this case,
only by the release manager.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
ok, I understand.
but blurb is an external tool (github.com/python/core-workflow).
There will be a new dependency, excepted if we store it into the Tools/
directory.
and if we add it into Tools, we have to add it to the old branches where blurb
is supposed
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
@haypo I don't want to add a new dependency, but it's an option.
I prefer the suggestion of Ned.
How do you imagine the patch ?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
New submission from Stéphane Wirtel:
Useless message
--
nosy: +matrixise
resolution: -> rejected
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
New submission from Stéphane Wirtel:
Please could you stop your spam ?
Thank you
--
nosy: +matrixise
resolution: -> rejected
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
New submission from Stéphane Wirtel :
maybe related to this issue: https://bugs.python.org/issue18831
we can't import a module where the name contains '-', for example
from my-module import my_function
but with importlib.import_module
we can import this module.
import_
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
hi @serhiy,
I understand but today, by error my CI has started to run the tests of an
external python package and in the tests, there was a lot of `from my-module
import XYZ` but in the django project, they load this module via
importlib.import_module or
New submission from Stéphane Wirtel :
Today, I was looking for the doc of unittest.mock and the result from
DuckDuckGo was this link:
https://docs.python.org/3.3/library/unittest.mock-examples.html
In the devguide, we stopped the support and everything about this version, in
the bug tracker
New submission from Stéphane Wirtel :
I have execute the tests of pytest with 3.8.0a1 and I get some issues, it's not
the case with 3.7.x (see the travis logs of pytest,
https://travis-ci.org/pytest-dev/pytest/branches)
I am going to create the same issue for pytest.
--
files
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Here is the issue in the bug tracker of pytest
https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/4716
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
maybe, I don't know but I have tested with pytest because the tests with
requests did not work.
I prefered to create this issue and the same issue on the bug tracker of pytest.
--
___
Python tracker
&
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi Guido,
The team of Pytest has been informed and after a small discussion, it seems
it's a problem with the way they use the AST for the assert keyword. They know
the issue, I hope they will fix it asap.
I would like to test pytest with 3.8 ;-)
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
I close this issue, thank you for your feedback.
--
resolution: -> rejected
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
ping ned, do we have a solution for this issue?
Thank you,
Stéphane
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch, patch
pull_requests: +11729, 11730
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch, patch, patch
pull_requests: +11729, 11730, 11731
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +11729
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35906>
___
___
Py
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi all,
Not sure for the right way for this fix but here is a PR. I am interested by
your feedback.
Thank you
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
pull_requests: -11731
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35906>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
pull_requests: -11730
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35906>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
nosy: +christian.heimes, martin.panter, matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35907>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi Phil,
This bug tracker is more for the core-dev and the contributors of CPython.
I suggest to you to use the right mailing list for your issues.
or use #python-fr on freenode
Mailing list: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I close
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
time -p make CC="/usr/bin/ccache gcc" --jobs 4 --silent > stdout.txt ^
stderr.txt
real 4.36
user 3.69
sys 1.73
on a 4-thread CPU
i7-7560U CPU @ 2.40GHz
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tr
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
hi @xtreak
because I don't have a windows vm with me, I can't reproduce this issue, but
maybe this issue is related with ensurepip or just with pip.
when I have seen this issue, my first reaction was "it's not related to
python
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi @Raymond
I use this script since 1 year for the compilation of Python,
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/11773#issuecomment-461179522
#!/usr/bin/env fish
set number_of_cpu (python3 -c "import os;
print(os.sysconf('SC_NPROCE
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
irc pong
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue2771>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
I have just tried with 3.7.2 and I don't get your error.
Python 3.7.2 (default, Jan 16 2019, 19:49:22)
[GCC 8.2.1 20181215 (Red Hat 8.2.1-6)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
good catch
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35982>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
ok, I was working on this issue.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35982>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
You can check this branch, but I have not created the PR because you were
working on this issue.
https://github.com/matrixise/cpython/commit/3f23deceef423b038273d28080d4aaee664b6bc9
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +11868
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35982>
___
___
Py
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
ok, I have created a PR, you can comment it and we can work together on this PR.
Have a nice day,
Stéphane
--
stage: patch review ->
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Jeroen, could you share your example? I am learning the C-API of Python and
this example could be interesting.
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi Giampaolo,
I added you to this issue, about the tests, I have created a very simple test
but I would like to know your advice.
Thank you,
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker
<ht
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +11870
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Hi,
I have created the PR for Maxwell.
After tomorrow, if we have no news from him, I propose to you to update/comment
the PR. Of course, I will add a co-authored-by field in the commit.
--
keywords: -patch
nosy: +matrixise
stage: patch review
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Could you share your example?
Thank you
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35985>
___
___
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
Just add the link to the other issue: https://bugs.python.org/issue33524
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
See this issue as a duplicata of this one:
https://bugs.python.org/issue35985
--
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
@steven
I have a solution with a css selector if we update the python-docs theme for
Sphinx.
You can check my screenshot
--
nosy: +matrixise
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file48136/print_screenshot.png
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +11875
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
I proposed my PR but I prefer a review because in the code of ipaddress, there
is a function for the validation of an address with the netmask. Maybe we could
use this function and try to refactor/improve the current code.
--
nosy: +matrixise
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
assignee: -> matrixise
nosy: +matrixise
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35993>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +11884
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35993>
___
___
Py
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
What do you think of this solution?
--
nosy: +vstinner
stage: patch review ->
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
You have a timeout, maybe you have an issue with your SMTP server. But in this
case, it's not an issue with Python.
--
nosy: +matrixise
resolution: -> rejected
stage: -> resolved
status: ope
Change by Stéphane Wirtel :
--
pull_requests: +11887
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue20523>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
I re-open this issue because after the change of the subject, maybe there is an
issue with the code of logging.handler.SMTPHandler + TLS.
--
resolution: rejected ->
status: closed -> open
___
Python t
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment:
@lidayan
I have checked the code of your PR, and I think there is an issue with your
code.
1. When you specify the secure flag to the SMTPHandler, it's because you will
start the TLS connection if the SMTP server supports the STARTTLS. First
101 - 200 of 1124 matches
Mail list logo
