Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
assignee: sandro.tosi -> docs@python
nosy: +docs@python
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11292>
___
___
Python-
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
assignee: sandro.tosi -> docs@python
nosy: +docs@python
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11293>
___
___
Python-
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
assignee: sandro.tosi -> docs@python
nosy: +docs@python
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11294>
___
___
Python-
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-January/002974.html
here's a patch to fix it.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
keywords: patch
messages: 129228
nosy: docs@python, sandro.tosi
priority: low
severity: n
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-January/002922.html , I
did a check on all the documented functions of curses and those available from
the module, and wrote a patch to include in the doc the missing ones (text is
mainly brought by
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 19:50, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> New submission from Sandro Tosi :
>
> Following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-January/002922.html ,
> I did a check on all the documented functions of curses and those availa
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-January/002786.html I
prepared this patch to
- correct Verhulst name
- explain that the results can be against common sense
Also, what's exactly related to "world coordinates"
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
AFAIK, this is obtained using \pdfinfo{} command[1][2][3]
[1] http://theoval.cmp.uea.ac.uk/~nlct/latex/pdfdoc/pdfdoc/pdfdoc.html
[2]
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/5958/is-hyperref-really-the-best-way-to-add-metadata-to-a-tex-file
[3] http://www.tug.org
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Éric, after #11085, I think the part of the doc you're referring to has been
moved to collections.abc.rst, is that correct? If so, can you please explain
what you'd like to see? all those ":class:`Container`" converted into "..
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
but that will generate "class collections.abc.Container" as text in the first
column of the table: do you really like it? I don't :)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Senthil,
what do you think about "documenting" those methods are private ones in the
urllib code (if not using _, at least a short comment above them)? at least we
have a mark it's an implementation decision and in case someone has the crazy
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11561>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Reattaching patch generated (against 3.2) with diff --git to preserve the
rename operation.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21339/test_future_diffgit.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
The number of items in the bookmark is controlled by
\setcounter{tocdepth}{1}
in sphinxmanual.cls, that's included in every latex file (the source of the PDF
documentation). The cls file is coming directly from sphinx, so Georg: what is
the purpo
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11699>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1571878>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
keywords: -patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1571878>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Brian,
are you able to replicate it? I just build 3.2 and default (3.3) on a Debian
unstable system and wasn't able to replicate it (with a busy loop like while
date ; do ./python -c "import multiprocessing.managers ; mpp =
multiprocessing.P
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Is someone still able to replicate this crash? I'm not, with a fresh built 3.2
and default (3.3), --with-pydebug enabled. Brian confirmed on msg132418 that he
can't any longer replicate it.
--
nosy: +s
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
can we close this issue then?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10632>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
This was fixed in f8fc2d03d7e4 by Benjamin Peterson.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> out of date
stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bug
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Stefan, can you please expand a bit this issue and details the places you
think can benefit from pyctype macros? you know, a patch would be the best :)
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
versions: +Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I took the freedom to refresh the patch against default (I don't know yet the
policies for what to backport and what not), built a debug version of python
with the patch applied and run the test suite with no regression.
A test would be nice to be added
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Gregor,
are you still able to replicate this bug? I just tried on a freshly built 3.3
and (hopefully correctly) following your description, I can print help just
fine:
>>> help(print)
Help on built-in function print in module builtins:
print(...)
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi,
I don't understand why you think tarfile should not fail in case you're trying
to add a non-existing file. the problem is that glob() already extracted a list
of files&dirs and then while the script is tar-ring them, you're removing some
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
As Benjamin just confirmed on #python-dev, sys.setprofile is not a cpython impl
detail, hence closing this issue.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson, sandro.tosi
resolution: -> invalid
stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected
status: open -&g
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
that's great, closing then :)
--
resolution: -> out of date
stage: needs patch ->
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi,
on a freshly built python 3.3 I got:
$ ./python
Python 3.3a0 (default:22ae2b002865, Mar 30 2011, 20:18:39)
[GCC 4.4.5] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> f
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On a freshly built 3.3 I don't get those RW anymore:
$ ./python -bb -E -Wd -m test -r -w -uall test_subprocess
Using random seed 7436992
[1/1] test_subprocess
.
this bit of output is from a test of stdout in a different process ...
.
this bit of outp
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11715>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
As discussed with Ezio on IRC, this doesn't apply anymore in 3.2 nor in 3.3, so
we guess we can simply mark is already fixed in a later version.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
closing like issue10023
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi,
I updated the patch, making one for 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2 (this last one applies
cleanly on default too).
As of merging simplejson, it's more a matter of porting it to Python 3. I'll
drop an email to Bob soon, let's see how it goes.
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21631/issue10019-py3.1.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10019>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21632/issue10019-py2.7.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10019>
___
___
Python-bug
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Oh, just to say I took the version as of
http://code.google.com/p/simplejson/source/detail?r=234
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hi,
After reading tomo cocoa mail at docs@ I gave a look at c-api/unicode file and
fixed some minor editing issues.
Regards,
Sandro
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: unicode_doc-default.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 133600
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
In addition, is there a reason for the sorting of UTF-8 UTF-32 UTF-16 and UTF-7
sections? why not alphabetically?
Also, several parts of the doc would need paragraph re-indentation (not done in
this patch due to clarity
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 23:34, Marc-Andre Lemburg
wrote:
> Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>
>> Sandro Tosi added the comment:
>>
>> In addition, is there a reason for the sorting of UTF-8 UTF-32 UTF-16 and
>> UTF-7 sections? why not
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 23:56, Marc-Andre Lemburg
wrote:
> Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment:
> I think you misunderstood: when reorganizing the contents of
> a file, it's better to apply the patch to all branches, rather
> than just t
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21657/unicode_doc-2.7.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11840>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21658/unicode_doc-3.1.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11840>
___
___
Python-bug
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
The status of the patches is this:
unicode_doc-2.7.patch - to be applied on 2.7
unicode_doc-3.1.patch - to be applied on 3.1
unicode_doc-default.patch - to be applied on 3.2 and then merged on default
I had to prepare multiple patches since the files are very
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks for reminding me of this issue. I let the same tight loop run on an
up-to-date python for a whole day and not stuck happened.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Adrian,
where do you see the 'entity' argument to class TreeBuilder?
In case I'm just missing in, would be interested in preparing a patch? you seem
to be knowledgeable about the matter, so it would be nice if you can share it
with us. You c
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
> How do I know the configuration options that the Ubuntu packager used?
the make file (likely) used is at:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~doko/python/pkg2.7-debian/view/head:/rules
Note: he is also a python developer, so you can add him to nosy and
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
This issue is to track the update process of json to the latest upstream
release (2.1.3).
As a start, here's the p-dev thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110704.html
--
assignee: sandro.tosi
components: Library
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hi, following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/003742.html
here are a couple of patches to call connect() after smtplib.SMTP() and
sendmail(). Patches are:
2.7: to be applied in 2.7 and merged into 3.1
3.2: to be applied in 3.2 and merged
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21732/smtp_connect-3.2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11883>
___
___
Python-bug
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/004032.html I
made a run of pep8 on Doc/includes/ py files.
i've prepared a patch against default; if it's considered worth I can prepare
patches for the other branches (for sure 2
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/004031.html
here's a patch to update the link to John Ousterhout paper. It can be applied
on all active branches.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following up with http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/004021.html
here's a couple of patch (the first for 2.7/3.1, the other for 3.2/default) to
fix the signature of Py_AddPendingCall (in particular the return type).
Adding in CC Ezio sin
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21814/py_addpendingcall-py32.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11942>
___
___
Pytho
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/004029.html
here's a small patch (applicable on all the active branches) to "actually" :)
connects the two paragraphs about modules search path.
--
assignee: docs@py
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Raymond, thanks for looking into it! What do you think of this patch? I
tried to save what I think was nice in the first paragraph and collapse it into
the second one.
--
___
Python tracker
<h
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21836/issue11948.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11948>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11049>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11015>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi all,
IIUIC we are left with issue11015.py3k.testdoc.1.patch) since
issue11015.py3k.remove_fcmp.{1,2}.patch has been already applied on default.
I just gave a look to the doc patch and it seems fine (it also applies without
any warning on default).
Eli, do
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Here's attached the patch including Terry's suggestion (gaah, sorry for this
late reply).
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21913/issue11948-v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
What about the attached (v3) patch? the "This allows...experts hands." part can
be remove completely if can be mis-interpreted.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21944/issue11948-v3.patch
___
Pyth
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
This issue is to keep track of the 'shutil' documentation update, since it
seems to miss several information (in particular in comparison with the
docstrings).
I'll post patches as soon as I get them.
--
assignee: docs@py
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Sorry Raymond for the bad editing, I was confused by thinking 'tutorial' is
particularly meant for new-coming people. Anyhow, sorry again: I attach a patch
removing the badworded part.
Please let me know if anything else is missing or needs fixing.
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Raymond, thanks for explaining the reasoning behind your replies, it really
helps me understand the "spirit" behind python :)
That said, and trying to be a bit more pragmatical, what are the next steps to
make this patch acceptable? It's kinda o
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I first would like to apologize if my comments were interpreted like I'd like
to do a poor quality job, that's actually the opposite! I just get caught by
surprise how a simple change in a word to better join two paragraphs grows up
like this -
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hi, only on 2.7 there were 2 entries for 'key function': this patches remove
the second occurrence, leaving that part of Glossary equals to the other
branches.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: remove_duplicate_key
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following up with http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/004159.html
here's a tiny patch to add a missing parenthesis.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: capi_buffer_PyBuffer_FillContiguousStrides-py27.patch
key
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
nope, from a quick glance at the docstrings text and what's on the ReST
documentation - was I a bit too catastrophic? :)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/004161.html, it
would be nice to have changeset 1811eb03ba00 applied in 2.7 (it's already there
in 3.1, 3.2 and default). Added Georg to the nosy list since it's the author of
th
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/004154.html and
what was done in 1de718a31004, here's a tiny patch to correct that typo in 2.7
too.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: struct_unpack_record.
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Following http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2010-December/002356.html a
possible solution is:
diff -r 3b07f7bb0289 Doc/library/dbm.rst
--- a/Doc/library/dbm.rst Thu Dec 02 19:29:18 2010 +0100
+++ b/Doc/library/dbm.rst Thu Dec 02 21:51:06 2010
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Eric,
on and up-to-date py3k I got this:
>>> for k, v in db.items():
... print(k, '\t', v)
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
AttributeError: '_dbm.dbm' object has no attribute 'item
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hello,
as reported[1] on python-doc, there's a typo in zipinfo doc.
[1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2010-December/002526.html
The attached (trivial) patch fixes it; the file would also need a rewrap to
80th column.
Cheers,
S
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hi,
with the attached patch (quite easy honestly ;)) we can generate an EPUB.
I don't have a real e-book reader to test it on, but I used calibre (and its
viewer) and the file is usable, and the cross-reference links works just fine;
there are som
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
ah great, 'bugs-generator' is my middle name :)
If I got it right, I've prepared another patch to add the archives generation
in Doc/makefile (for dist target) and then add them to the download page.
Just let me know if I missed something, I&#
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I just tried John's patch, and:
- it still applies without problem (except for a bit of offset)
- I can confirm that it actually adds test coverage for leapdays() function
(bringing calendar coverage from 71% to 72%).
I think it would be good to apply
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Nick,
the "See also" section already points to unittest module; are you asking to
extend its description to mention that's the tool people should use for their
unittest suites?
Cheers,
Sandro
--
nos
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hello,
I tried on a freshly build 2.7, and I can't replicate the reported error. Could
it be it has been fixed by r78136?
Sridhar, are you still seeing this error?
Cheers,
Sandro
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
P
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Already fixed in r86107
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: commit review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Jan, are you still going to work on this feature?
Hi Éric, what are we going to do: include Jan's patch when ready or Trent's
`which` tool on google code?
Cheers,
Sandro
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Pyth
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
That's interesting: do we have a place where we explain how to read the doc? I
mean, a place were we can provide example/explain how we write docs, so f.e.:
str.rsplit([sep[, maxsplit]])
is a description for a method that could accept 2 optional argu
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi, I've updated the patch, to also mention the 'epub' target in Dco/README.txt
but mainly to fix an HTML error in indexcontent.html that prevents the epub to
be correctly generated.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file2021
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Alexander, can you confirm this bug is MacOs specific? I tried with
python2.6 on a Debian sid @64 bit but I can't replicate it. Also, do you see it
only on 2.6? if so, I doubt that it will ever be fixed; f.e. on release2.7
branch I have:
Python
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Amaury, Martin ack'ed the patch: is there something else you want to do?
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
The patch no longer applies cleanly to 2.7 head (but it should be trivial to
update it).
Martin, Benjamin: as this targets 2.7, do you think the patch is acceptable in
that branch or it's too late?
--
nosy: +sandro
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4662>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4662>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Ned, thanks for the fast check! I tried to applied the patch (it failed, so
it required a bit of manual editing) but when compiling I got:
/home/morph/python-dev/py3k/Modules/timemodule.c: In function ‘time_asctime’:
/home/morph/python-dev/py3k/Modules
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi, I think the best way to test this patch is to apply the fix and then
compile python on a Solaris system (which I don't have): is someone owning a
Solaris would run this test?
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
P
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I've refreshed the patch to only add DeprecationWarning for tempnam, tmpnam and
tmpfile.
--
stage: -> patch review
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20218/issue4662-rel2.7.patch
___
Python tracke
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Could someone give a look to this patch? I can work on fixing the missing stuff
(if any :)).
--
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi, I've applied the patch and it goes fine (except for some offsets and the
fact it was generated inside Lib/test) and the tests are still all ok. I'd
suggest to apply it.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
stage: ->
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Ok, so the situation is:
- I've test on debian sid and it works fine
- Dave on a Fedora 13 and it works
- I asked a couple of guys to try it on their systems, that's Fedora14 and
Gentoo and it works fine
So I think we can conclude it's a Fedora
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hello, after I saw that in issue9554, I created a small patch to replace all
assertEquals(None, ...)
with
assertIsNone(...)
It's not rocket science, but I think it makes test suite "better" and leverage
new unittest features.
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi all, I think this patch would be nice to be applied, but before start
working on it (like adapt it to new code & stuff), I'd like to know if we are
really targetting 2.7 or should we instead targer 3.3.
Cheers, Sandro
--
nosy: +sandro.t
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Ok, I've changed the version field and refreshed the patch against py3k.
--
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 2.7
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20276/issue5485-py3k.patch
___
Python tracker
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
This was already fixed (in an unrelated commit) with r85630 and prevoious, so
I'm marking this issue as closed.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tra
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I had that in mind since quite some time, so I'm taking ownership of this issue.
--
assignee: -> sandro.tosi
nosy: +sandro.tosi
versions: +Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10849>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
201 - 300 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
