Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
New changeset 6843ffe4533e9f2cde036296fd932fef6f059687 by Pablo Galindo in
branch 'master':
Revert "bpo-32409: Fix regression in activate.bat on international Windows
(GH-10295)" (GH-10403)
https://github.com/p
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
nosy: +pablogsal
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35197>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
I am collecting information on how different compilers behave with the `static
inline`. I am checking the following compilers:
ARM GCC
AVR GCC
CLANG X86_64
CLANG RISC-V
ELLCC
GCC X86_64
ICC x86_64
MIPS GCC
MSP GCC
POWERPC GCC
AIX Compiler (xlc)
SunPro
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
>Do you know if it's used outside CPython?
Although not a complete view, all of the mentions I can find in GitHub is in
copies of CPython/forks/vendoring of Cpython:
https://github.com/search?l=C&p=13&q=gram
New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado :
As commented on Issue33878, the fact that expressions like (x) = 42 are
accepted is, in reality, an implementation detail and they should be disallowed.
--
assignee: pablogsal
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 329590
nosy: pablogsal
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +9718
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
pull_requests: +9719
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33878>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
nosy: +gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35207>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
I am not sure if this is the cleanest/simplest implementation...if you think
there is a better way to do this I am happy to change the Pull Request :)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
Apparently setting the env variable OBJC_DISABLE_INITIALIZE_FORK_SAFETY=YES
should fix some fork-related changes. Have you tried already doing this? Does
it change the behaviour of the errors in any way?
--
nosy: +pablogsal
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
Hi @paul,
have you already checked
https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/memory.html#customize-memory-allocators?
--
nosy: +pablogsal
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg329755
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35215>
___
___
Python-bug
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
Hi @paul,
have you already checked
https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/memory.html#customize-memory-allocators ?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
Apparently, GitLab have a more permanent solution around this by enabling the
Objective-C runtime before any forking happens:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/16649/diffs
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
This can a duplicate of https://bugs.python.org/issue33725
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
pull_requests: +9754, 9755, 9756
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32492>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
pull_requests: +9754, 9755
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32492>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
pull_requests: +9754
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32492>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
pull_requests: -9756
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32492>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
pull_requests: -9755
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32492>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
nosy: +pablogsal
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35214>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
> The point of this 'issue' is to ask the community to suggest how i can go
> about finding where the problem is. As I said, there is a lot of code :)
Sadly, this tracker is to track bugs related to CPython. Modifying the
interpret
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
I agree with Karthikeyan: This is is the expected behaviour. The moment you use
a mock, any implementation details are lost unless you use wraps or similar to
also transfer the call to the/a real object.
--
nosy: +pablogsal
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
Will
--
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg329801
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31541>
___
___
Python-bug
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
nosy: +pablogsal
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35221>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
I cannot initialize the interpreter after compiling with
--with-memory-sanitizer:
❯ CC=clang ./configure --with-memory-sanitizer && make -j
❯ ./python
Python 3.8.0a0 (heads/master:1584a00815, Nov 13 2018, 03:29:18)
[Clang 7.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_7
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
Thanks @alex! I will try again after linking against ASAN-compiled version of
my libraries.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
pull_requests: +9768
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30156>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
pull_requests: +9787
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34784>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
PR9665 solves also Issue28709
--
nosy: +pablogsal
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34784>
___
___
Pytho
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
xvfb is a utility that allows you to run a command in a virtual X server
environment. I assume that is needed for the doctests that use the X server. I
assume is related to PR9806
--
___
Python tracker
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado :
--
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35241>
___
___
Python-bugs-
New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado :
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/147/builds/430/steps/4/logs/stdio
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/109/builds/789/steps/4/logs/stdio
==
FAIL
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
New changeset bfb855bef6b428d639693caaf4e4c84cbb8a2f51 by Pablo Galindo in
branch 'master':
bpo-34784: Implement correct cleanup in PyStructSequence new implementation
(GH-10536)
https://github.com/python/cpyt
New submission from Pablo Torres Navarrete :
Index: socket.py
===
--- socket.py (revision 73134)
+++ socket.py (working copy)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
gethostbyname() -- map a hostname to its IP number
gethostbyaddr() -- map an IP
Changes by Pablo Torres Navarrete :
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6173>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
Confirmed on versions 2.6.2, 3.0.1 and 3.1rc1. On the three of them, I
tried this:
>>> import parser
>>> test = 'def foo():\n\tpass\n\n# comment'
>>> parser.suite(test)
Traceback (most recent call last):
F
Changes by Pablo Torres Navarrete :
--
versions: +Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1184112>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
Wouldn't it be more pythonic to just try sys.stdin.fileno() and catch
the AtributeError too?
def _bootstrap(self):
try:
os.close(sys.stdin.fileno())
except Atribute
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
Patch attached. While I was at it, I also removed stupid whitespace and
generally made the module more PEP8-compliant.
--
nosy: +ptn
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14311/patch
___
Python tracker
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
The patch for issue #5800 solves this.
--
nosy: +ptn
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5801>
___
___
Pytho
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
+1, but I can't apply the patch cleanly:
$ patch -p0 < threading.diff
patching file Doc/library/threading.rst
Hunk #1 succeeded at 198 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 211 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 230 (offset -
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
Cannot reproduce on Ubuntu 9.04 with py3k at revision 73267:
$ ./python
Python 3.1rc1+ (py3k:73267, Jun 7 2009, 14:45:03)
[GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more inform
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
Nope. Our working copies seem to be different. I'm uploading mine,
which I just update to revision 73468. Please diff yours against that
and against HEAD too, just in case.
Hunk 2 on threading.py fails because your attributes use two le
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
> I'm diffing against the 2.7 branch, I guess your comes from the 3.2?
*forehead meets desktop*
Patch applies cleanly and all tests pass. I used it for a while and
everything seemed OK. After someone else tests, I say we g
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
+1 on making it a keyword-only argument.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6064>
___
___
Python-bug
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
Added a pointer from #5801 to here.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5800>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
I added the patch for #5800
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14321/patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
New submission from Pablo Torres Navarrete :
I propose that all formal parameters that really act as options/switches
be made keyword-only. Examples of switches are all flags, timeouts,
'verbose' bools, maximums and minimums, etc.
This stresses the difference between needed i
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
OK, bad idea it is then. Thank you for your time.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6372>
___
___
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
I cleaned the rest of the module by shortening lines that are too long,
removing useless blocks of empty lines and adding whitespace around
operators and after commas. Nothing in the programming logic was changed.
--
Added file: http
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
The patch applies to rev 73702 of the py3k branch.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5801>
___
___
Pablo Torres Navarrete added the comment:
Oops, forgot to add the .diff extension so web browsers don't get
confused. Their contents are the same though.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14411/wsgiref-patch.diff
___
P
New submission from PABLO LOBATO DE LA CRUZ :
Deep recursion crashes on Windows (Python 3.9) when the depth limit is
increased and no error is shown.
Seems to work fine on other systems that I have tried (Linux and MacOS).
Please find attached the script to reproduce the error.
Expected and
PABLO LOBATO DE LA CRUZ added the comment:
I see thanks for answering so quickly. But why does it happen only on
Windows?
El jue, 28 oct 2021 a las 23:09, Steve Dower ()
escribió:
>
> Steve Dower added the comment:
>
> This is almost certainly because of how Windows handles st
PABLO LOBATO DE LA CRUZ added the comment:
I see. Thank you very much Steve :)
El vie, 29 oct 2021 a las 0:29, Steve Dower ()
escribió:
>
> Steve Dower added the comment:
>
> > But why does it happen only on Windows?
>
> Because it's the operating system that
Pablo S Blum de Aguiar added the comment:
This is just to note that I'm investigating this as part of the CPython sprint
in EuroPython.
--
nosy: +scorphus
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Pablo S Blum de Aguiar added the comment:
This is just to note that I'm investigating this issue as part of the CPython
sprint in EuroPython.
--
nosy: +scorphus
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Pablo Santiago Blum de Aguiar :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +8070
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Pablo Santiago Blum de Aguiar :
Some warn messages miss space between words, such as:
Use of 'buffering' argument is deprecated and ignoredsince Python 3.0.
in bz2 library, and:
keyfile and certfile are deprecated, use acustom context instead
in many librarie
Pablo Santiago Blum de Aguiar added the comment:
Sorry, only when creating the PR I read that trivial changes like this need no
issue.
--
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Change by Pablo Santiago Blum de Aguiar :
--
pull_requests: +9581
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35128>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Pablo Santiago Blum de Aguiar added the comment:
You have a point. They make the message more readable. I've readded the double
spaces.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Pablo Santiago Blum de Aguiar added the comment:
Thanks again for reviewing, merging and backporting. Next time I'll try and
backport as well :-)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
4501 - 4566 of 4566 matches
Mail list logo