Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Amaury I tested with Windows Vista and the latest 2.6 and 2.7 maintainance
releases, what did you use?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue706
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as suggested in msg81496.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can an AIX user state whether or not this is still an issue. The current patch
is a one liner. A patch that looks in all the known
directories was promised but never delivered.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> behavior
ve
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing as no reply to msg110333.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
A small simple patch that I see no problems with.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> feature request
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.0, Python 3.1
___
Python t
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Does this need to be addressed or can it be closed as out of date or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue747
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg81501.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg109729.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There are messages both for and against the patch which contains a unit test.
Can we have a statement from a knowledgeable HTML person as to whether the
patch should be accepted or rejected.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed -> pa
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue761888>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue816059>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg106638.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there any interest in this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There are at least three messages stating that
os.path.supports_unicode_filenames should go so can someone please provide a
definitive statement regarding its future.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing as no reply to msg110335.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no response to msg81870.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue783528>
___
___
Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still an issue with later versions of Python and Cygwin?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed -> needs patch
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
&l
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close in a couple of weeks unless someone has a good reason to keep it
open.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I don't see this as particularly useful but other opinions are welcome.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as os.popen deprecated in favour of subprocess.popen.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Still an issue in 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue798
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Patch is really simple and looks ok to me, can we get this committed please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've tried reproducing this on Windows Vista but sorry I can't make any sense
out of it. I've assumed that a unit test can be based around code given in
msg18142.
--
components: +Library (Lib) -Windows
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: ->
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone reply to Daniel Stutzbach's query in msg104541, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue809846>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Reopened because the history shows comments and patches months after it was set
to closed and won't fix, see msg61886.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: wont fix ->
status: closed -> open
___
Python tra
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
#1545463 has been reopened with comments about being used as a stop gap.
Possibly review and implementation of the patch here would be a better option,
sorry it's over my head.
--
versions: +Python 3.2
___
P
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
All that is needed is the doc patch to be applied and the issue closed. Or
have I missed something?
--
assignee: jackjansen -> d...@python
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, d...@python
stage: unit test needed -> patch
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've deliberately changed the stage to patch review and the version to 3.2 to
highlight the fact that a lot of work will be needed to get the new regex
engine into the standard library. Feel free to change these as is seen fit.
--
nosy: +Breamo
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As Carbon is deprecated and the resolution is already won't fix I'll close this
in a couple of weeks unless anyone objects.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.5, Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue832159>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as bsddb has been deprecated in 2.x and removed from py3k.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg109263.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue834840>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg107343.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close in a couple of weeks unless someone states this is still a problem.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Marc-Andre as there's no comments since your last post would you like to take
this forward, cheers.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is more trouble than it's worth because it's hopelessly out of date.
I think this needs a new patch if it's still relevant or else it should be
closed.
--
___
Python tracker
<http
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg81880.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue846817>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Anyone interested in this? I found the patch unreadable but YMMV.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue849
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: needs patch -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue850482>
___
_
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as svn blame shows this is hopelessly out of date.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This is a Sun Studio problem not a Python problem.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue822005>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't see this happening after 6 1/2 years, feel free to reopen if you want
to work on this.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm just wondering if the original code could be the cause of subtle bugs with
socket.py, anyone? (I'm no sockets guru). There's a proposed inline patch
that's never been implemented, what do you (plural) make of it?.
--
nosy
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can this be closed as popen2 is deprecated?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue886
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This is still a problem with 2.6 and 2.7. I don't know how to test this with
py3k as cPickle doesn't exist, can someone advise, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue892902>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks as won't fix unless anyone objects.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem, sorry I don't have a box to test it on?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing as no reply to msg110827.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
assignee: tarek -> d...@python
nosy: +d...@python
stage: -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as a duplicate of #2001, but please keep in mind msg75324.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've closed #902061 as a duplicate of this, but please keep in mind msg75324
from that issue.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks unless someone shows an interest in
running with it.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks unless anyone objects.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The docs for start() state "This method will raise a RuntimeException if called
more than once on the same thread object."
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
__
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I agree with Dan's comment in msg112741 about dead code so this only applies to
2.7. I'll raise a new issue to get the dead code removed from py3k.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed ->
New submission from Mark Lawrence :
The title says it all.
--
files: imaplibpy3k.diff
keywords: patch
messages: 114331
nosy: BreamoreBoy
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: patch review
status: open
title: remove dead code from py3k imaplib
versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2
Added
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue919238>
___
___
Python-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is a one line change to a compiled regex. Would someone with html
and/or regex knowledge like to comment, thanks, as I've no idea as to the
implications. I also agree with comments in msg81692 regarding better unit
tests. Please don
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem on Solaris?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue976
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Ah I was misreading things, I too can confirm that it is still a problem.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue706
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
> The warning in the dict case is especially important
It's worth noting that this warning is dependent on hash() producing the same
values for 'equivalent' bytes and str instances. This seems a bit fragile, and
is something that could pot
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue979407>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +ron_adam
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue979658>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue984870>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There were no comments in reply to msg84306, anyone got any comments now? If
not could someone take a look at the patch and if happy get it committed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have this committed please, msg82420 says the patches are ok.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue991
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue992389>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue995907>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The compiler package has been removed from py3k.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Brian or Tim any interest in this?
I consider #2889 to be a duplicate of this and not the other way around.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, brian.curtin, tim.golden
stage: -> patch review
type: -> feature request
versions: +Python 3.2 -Pyth
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Brian or Tim any interest in this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, brian.curtin, tim.golden
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg82076.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close in a couple of weeks unless anyone objects.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1016626>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2624>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg82073.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Any interest in this or can it be closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.p
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg82072.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: unit test needed -> patch review
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Any interest in this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1028088>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still valid?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1038
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +ron_adam
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1038909>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks unless someone wants it kept open.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Anyone interested in running with this as it's still a problem in all versions?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed -> patch review
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
__
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1047
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
> Actually, no, the "consistency" of hashes is necessary for the
> BytesWarning to be useful with dicts.
Yes. That's precisely the point I was trying to make. (Probably badly.)
That's why I was calling the usefulness of BytesW
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1049450>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1050268>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1052827>
___
_
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone provide an updated unit test to accompany the code patch.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1053
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +gpolo
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1053687>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks unless someone wants it kept open.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
type: feature request -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tra
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I think this should be closed as it's similar to #1051840, agreed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't see this being accepted as it's not had public exposure, at least not
that I'm aware of. Other opinions welcomed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks unless anyone objects.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
601 - 700 of 12223 matches
Mail list logo