Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
I don't know if it's worth it to edit the results to return Python data
structures in the linked PR. The current version is more concise and indicates
the general result of the function instead of the actual return values of the
func
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34475>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26093>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
It seems __repr__ call to partial object has qualname but I think it always
returns "partial". Ref :
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/0afada163c7ef25c3a9d46ed445481fb69f2ecaf/Lib/functools.py#L276
>>> import functools
&
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Thanks for the report. I think translations use Github issues
(https://github.com/python/python-docs-ja/issues).
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0545/#language-team tells me "Redirect
issues posted on b.p.o to the correct GitHub issue tr
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34600>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34624>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
The original escape was done with 2a862c614d6d3ff50dc644150670651fdc9f3a99
which was in 2000. The doc example you are referring to at [1] was added with
https://bugs.python.org/issue31975 and there doesn't seem to be a test
involving re
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31577>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Can you please describe the problem and the output you are expecting so that we
can determine if it's a bug in Python or the logic of the code which will get
better help from sites stackoverflow ? It will be helpful if you can do `tree`
o
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30238>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31535>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
All config options are converted to lowercase when they are stored. You can
customise this with
https://docs.python.org/3/library/configparser.html#configparser.ConfigParser.optionxform.
You can customize it more with
https://docs.python.org/3
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Ah sorry, didn't notice it was about comments. It seems config.optionxform =
str has no effect on comments.
Thanks
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Ah my bad again. The config.optionxform = str does the trick. I was using an
older object.
from configparser import ConfigParser
config = ConfigParser(allow_no_value=True)
config.optionxform = str
config.add_section('default_settings')
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34629>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33649>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34628>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34641>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34637>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
There seems to be some of the similar cases that have tests added as part of
c960f26044edaea6669e60859ecf590c63c65e62 and the original error message added
at 3e0055f8c65c407e74ce476b8e2b1fb889723514.
Existing tests :
>>> f(x()=2)
Traceb
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
There doesn't seem to be any performance regression hoping that I am doing the
benchmarks correctly. Some numbers for the PR.
# Master
git checkout master
git clean -xdf && ./configure && make -s -j4
$ cpython git:(master
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Tested the patch.
➜ cpython git:(master) ✗ ./python.exe
Python 3.8.0a0 (heads/master-dirty:731ff68eee, Sep 12 2018, 11:40:16)
[Clang 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Seems like this is an explicit choice that there is also a test with the URL
"user:passw...@www.python.org" . Ref :
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/731ff68eeef58babdf2b32dc9a73b141760c2be9/Lib/test/test_httplib.py#L640
. You can
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34645>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34656>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
> Run "pydoc -w " to write out the HTML documentation for a module
to a file named ".html".
As mentioned in the help this works only for modules and since import is a
keyword it throws an error. Maybe this could be
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Seems like formatting timezone names on Windows has a lot of issues. I don't if
it's related to the ones reported before but just like to add reference comment
with more issues : https://bugs.python.org/msg302937
Thanks
--
nos
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33173>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33052>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32496>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32153>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Is it something specific to the environment? I tried the test on Ubuntu 16.04
on both master and on v3.6.3 with no errors. Maybe if you can execute the
following code based on which the test is executed then it will be helpful to
debug this
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31290>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Can confirm this behavior on CPython master as well. It seems that when an
attribute is deleted then a deleted flag is set for the attribute at
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/73820a60cc3c990abb351540ca27bf7689bce8ac/Lib/unittest/mock.py#L737
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +8731
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31635>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32313>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34683>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
I have tried running pandas test suite under Python 3.8 and the below code
segfault as part of the test suite. Pandas uses Python 3.7 in Travis and it
runs fine. There is also NumPy related code in the trace but it also seems to
run fine under
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34690>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Copying my GitHub comment here :
If I have only D or no D then there is no segfault. It occurs when I have
either A, D or B, D, or C, D.
**Leaving out column D**
```python
from pandas import DataFrame
import pandas as pd
df = DataFrame({'A
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34676>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29341>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Thanks for the contribution. Is there any syntax error on using the file since
you have classified it as compile error or the error messages are related to
linters? On a general note style related contributions are not merged since
they create
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34697>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34659>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33367>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23278>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Pandas issue that contains other segfaults :
https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/22714
Thanks
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34712>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34683>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34713>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33138>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Since there is work on asyncio docs overhaul I just want to bring this to your
attention since I don't know if this has already been resolved with the merged
PRs to master and your thoughts on this.
Thanks
--
nosy: +yseli
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue28908>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34719>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34702>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
It seems there is a sporadic failure in Azure linux buildbots while installing
dependencies with the following error. It also fails sporadically on separate
PRs that trigger the build. I noticed it for the few days since README Azure
badge had
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34732>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
I think this is a valid UUID and trying this on JDK 9 also returns 15 for the
version like Python. Am I missing something here?
➜ ~ jshell
| Welcome to JShell -- Version 9.0.4
| For an introduction type: /help intro
jshell> import java.u
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Seems there is an open issue about this : https://bugs.python.org/issue31958
Thanks
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Related issue : https://bugs.python.org/issue34732 . It has a PR to raise an
exception in the constructor and it seems to cause tests to fail at
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/python/cpython/build/3.8build22654
Thanks
--
nosy: +xtreak
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34728>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Strange it's present on both 3.8.a0 and for 3.6.6 but not for 3.7.0
Thanks
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34742>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Seems like a reasonable addition (Customization of writing to sys.stderr too) .
It seems to have been inherited from optparse which has pretty much the same
code with hardcoded exit code. The solution suggested is to catch SystemExit
and provide
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34559>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34344>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33813>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33545>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Can you please link to the relevant documentation that is misleading? As I can
see from the source code return value is a Mock object [1] which I believe the
docs state as below :
https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.mock.html#calling
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31628>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33110>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
I think `asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe(coro, loop)` returns a
concurrent.futures.Future [1] which supports timeout and not asyncio.Future
which doesn't support timeout. Please add in if I am missing anything. Since
asyncio docs are
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Thanks for the report. Can you please add a little more description on
reproducing this issue along with OS details ? By "the installation of readline
(6.2.4.1) [1]" are you referring to a third party package that you have
installed w
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32995>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32291>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32019>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31898>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31865>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34752>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31146>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27903>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27121>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26767>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
I think there have been some improvements merged with
https://bugs.python.org/issue12458 . I am not sure if the patch covers more
cases. I ran the tests attached in the patch and some of them cause
RuntimeError in master.
# bpo26452.py
def f
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26495>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26214>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Seems this is not reproducible at least on Python 3.6.4 and Master branch.
# bpo24997.py
from unittest.mock import *
m = Mock()
m(1,2)
m.call_args
print("1 ", m.call_args == call(1,2))
print("2 ", m.call_args != call(1,2))
#
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25240>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Thanks for the script. The crash is still reproducible as of now with at least
python 2.7.14 . I need to check on the latest 2.7 branch yet.
On python 3 it produces an error as below :
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "../ba
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25312>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Reproducible on latest 2.7 branch as well. Stack trace as below :
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
dict_set_item_by_hash_or_entry (
op={'code': , 'ast': , '__builtins__': , '__file__
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25952>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24834>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24174>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment:
Seems to have been implemented with ce913877e42b7fa03434c2e765ace891e0f5c4dc .
https://bugs.python.org/issue25195
$ git checkout ce913877e42b7fa03434c2e765ace891e0f5c4dc~1 Lib/unittest/mock.py
$ ./python.exe ../backups/bpo24997.py
1 True
2 True
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24307>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :
--
nosy: +xtreak
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34709>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
2601 - 2700 of 3092 matches
Mail list logo