Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Related : https://bugs.python.org/issue14067
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue14067>
___
___
Python-bug
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
I changed to won't fix due to the note on incompatibility, until we resolve on
a way forward.
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
resolution: -> wont fix
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
I posted on Python-dev (not sure if it will help), I wanted to do this in 2019
but looks like there is still no consensus yet.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
@eric.araujo curious if you still have the interest to work on this. If not, I
can help open a PR.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue11
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
@Julian Am leaning more into us applying a relevant fix, than adjusting the
documentation.
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Yes, this was also proposed here: https://bugs.python.org/issue11602
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Yes, it is that's why I added the clarity "It looks like it *is* actually" above
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.pyt
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
@dankreso, the issue is still open and no one has claimed it yet. So feel free
to open a pull request.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue28
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
@BTaskaya From what I see, there is no consensus yet.If you are interested in
exploring, go on.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Am in favor of opening a separate ticket for this. Thanks
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue22640>
___
___
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38782>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Am abit swamped and sick atm. You can go on and submit a fix.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
@victor looks to be the author of the change the introduced the tests that can
resolve this.
Victor, can we consider this closed. I have no problem closing the issue and
the related PR.
--
nosy: +vstinner
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
I just pulled changes from upstream and when I build with:
./configure --with-pydebug && make -j
Am getting a Segmentation fault:
./python -E -S -m sysconfig --generate-posix-vars ;\
if test $? -ne 0 ; then \
echo "generate-posi
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +pablogsal, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39044>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Actually my master had some segfaulting changes that I had moved to it in
error. Thanks.
Closing this.
--
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracke
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Confirmedforgeting to run makedistclean was the problem.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
> The most common reason is that when promotions of the youngest generations
> happen,
>some very young objects that just arrived in the generation are >promoted
>because we have >reached a threshold, and its death will be >delayed.
W
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
> What threshold is this?
> This is the different thresholds for the generations that you can get using
> gc.get_threshold(). >They are in relationship to the number of objects in
> every generation (there are slightly different >ru
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39123>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32599>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
>5 bit *per object* is a lot because it scales with the number of objects. It
>will quickly obliterate >any gain that we get from some objects being
>deallocated sooner (which is what we are trying >to achieve). Using
>inter-generati
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
>
I suppose we would need to experiment, but for what I have seen I think two or
three :) What do you think?
IMO, I think experimenting with two steps is good enough.
--
___
Python tracker
<
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
> About "5 bits", no, we don't have 'em. Even the relatively modest > ugliness
> we have now makes it impossible to port Python to a word->addressed machine
> (I'm not sure any still exist!). Nothing in C >guar
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
The changes required to successfully do this backport are many and affect
critical areas. I am not in a hurry to do this. If anyone else wants to take
this up quickly, please do.
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
> Do you mean that there is a risk that the backport introduces a regression in
> another part of the code? If yes, I would suggest to not backport the change
> to *stable* branches.
My worry are the many changes that are required to ceval to
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Leaving this for @victor to decide since he is the PR author.
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
:func:`os.makedirs` is equivalent to ``mkdir -p`` and :meth:`Path.mkdir()` when
given an optional *exist_ok* argument.
--
messages: 360808
nosy: nanjekyejoannah
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Indicate that os.makedirs is
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +17596
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18216
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +17600
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18220
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
I suggest implementing a C-API for copying data into a buffer exported by an
obj. i.e
int PyObject_CopyToObject(PyObject *obj, void *buf, Py_ssize_t len,
char fortran)
as was intended in PEP 3118. The documentation there says
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
We have a memory-view object represented with the following structure:
typedef struct {
PyObject_VAR_HEAD
_PyManagedBufferObject *mbuf; /* managed buffer */
Py_hash_t hash; /* hash value for read-only views */
int flags
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
Please note the compile warning:
./pyconfig.h:1590: warning: "_POSIX_C_SOURCE" redefined
#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L
In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/libc-header-start.h:33,
from /usr/include/s
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
This is to track the high-level implementation of PEP 554.
Please see the PEP here: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0554/
*** Note: PEP not accepted yet.
--
assignee: nanjekyejoannah
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 363561
nosy
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +18175
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18817
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Am hesitant on re-opening this.
I think it sounds more meaningful to open a new issue for the new
suggestion that requires deprecating this
current behavior and introducing the new intended functionality.
Best,
Joannah
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 8:40 PM
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 5f9c131c099d6675d1a9d0228497865488afd548 by Javad Mokhtari in
branch 'master':
bpo-40045: Make "dunder" method documentation easier to locate (#19153)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5f9c131c099d6675d1a9
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset bb852266b77ffeeb09a42847c907829eec6d5cb5 by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.8':
bpo-40045: Make "dunder" method documentation easier to locate (GH-19153)
(GH-19198)
https://github.com/p
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset c3622b2dcc9278900a7e3cbef12edfa83a8728ed by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.7':
bpo-40045: Make "dunder" method documentation easier to locate (GH-19153)
(GH-19199)
https://github.com/p
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
I think this is resolved. Someone can re-open if they feel discontent. Thanks
@javadmokhtari for the patch.
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
After merging the associated PR, I believe this is resolved. Thanks Alex for
reporting and solving this
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
stage: -> resolved
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
What is your reasoning on referencing just one of the PEPs and not both of
them?
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
> PEP 275 actually links to PEP 3103 to explain why it is rejected
Well, am not very convinced if consensus was reached on range tests so I will
refrain for someone else's opinion as it is not as apparent t
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset f25fb6ebfec894c01bc927c9aae7924ffc826d11 by Joannah Nanjekye in
branch 'master':
bpo-39470: Indicate that ``os.makedirs`` is equivalent to ``Path.mkdir``
(GH-18216)
https://github.com/python/cpyt
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39470>
___
___
Pyth
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
>From this:
Now you want to store the point in a single SQLite column. First you'll have to
choose one of the supported types first to be used for representing the point.
First looks repeated.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Docum
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40537>
___
___
Pyth
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
pull_requests: +19301
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19985
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
nosy_count: 1.0 -> 2.0
pull_requests: +19304
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19988
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.p
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset d10091aa171250c67a5079abfe26b8b3964ea39a by Joannah Nanjekye in
branch 'master':
bpo-40502: Initialize n->n_col_offset (GH-19988)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d10091aa171250c67a5079abfe2
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
nosy_count: 4.0 -> 5.0
pull_requests: +19356
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20047
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.p
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 7ba1f75f3f02b4b50ac6d7e17d15e467afa36aac by Joannah Nanjekye in
branch 'master':
bpo-38872: Document exec symbol for codeop.compile_command (GH-20047)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/7ba1f75f3f02b4b50ac6d7e17d15e4
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38872>
___
___
Pyth
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset c1203b75ffe429b28cb2e2480deb0d0b8d3a941c by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.7':
bpo-38872: Document exec symbol for codeop.compile_command (GH-20047) (#20099)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c1203b75ffe429b28cb2e2480deb0d
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
nosy_count: 12.0 -> 13.0
pull_requests: +19405
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18817
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
pull_requests: +19406
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19985
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset eb5ce324f724a59c51d7a76d1dd49b550cdf386b by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.8':
bpo-38872: Document exec symbol for codeop.compile_command (GH-20047) (GH-20098)
https://github.com/python/cpyt
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +christian.heimes
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40635>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 9d17cbf33df7cfb67ca0f37f6463ba5c18676641 by Joannah Nanjekye in
branch 'master':
bpo-32604: PEP 554 for use in test suite (GH-19985)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9d17cbf33df7cfb67ca0f37f6463ba
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
I will look at this tommorrow. Am abit busy today. Thanks Victor
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 6fad3e6b49f6a9f8b8a6635c41371e4451479f86 by Antoine in branch
'master':
bpo-40552 Add 'users' variable in code sample (tutorial 4.2). (GH-19992)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6fad3e6b49f6a9f8b8a6
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Thanks for the PR Antoine Wecxsteen. I will close this.
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Yes, We can track it under here: https://bugs.python.org/issue32604#msg369454
Following up when my schedule improves this week.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
pull_requests: +19839
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20611
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 235f918f44bb89e27190db2f1823d191dbd4ad28 by Ram Rachum in branch
'master':
bpo-40876: Clarify error message in the csv module (GH-20653)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/235f918f44bb89e27190db2f1823d191dbd4ad28
-
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
PR merged. We can close this. Thanks Ram.
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset bae872f1fe9b3a0d3e3b8800a2ac8d6b440d6e4d by Joannah Nanjekye in
branch 'master':
bpo-32604: Recommit "bpo-32604: PEP 554 for use in test suite (GH-19985)"
(GH-20611)
https://github.com/p
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
pull_requests: +19974
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20777
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah, pablogsal
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41133>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
The regression is tracked here: https://bugs.python.org/issue40456
And a PR is under review here: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17134
Also, this issue is a duplicate to this: https://bugs.python.org/issue40456
One of these should be closed
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31898>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue14189>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
nosy_count: 8.0 -> 9.0
pull_requests: +20474
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21324
___
Python tracker
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
stage: -> needs patch
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue12165>
___
___
Python-bugs-lis
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0
pull_requests: +20476
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21326
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
nosy_count: 5.0 -> 6.0
pull_requests: +20480
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21330
___
Python tracker
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Given EOL is this still relevant? as it is marked 2.7
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
I find this issue to be less descriptive. Maybe a sentence to complement the
title can help others understand even better.
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
nosy_count: 8.0 -> 9.0
pull_requests: +20488
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21340
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
PR updated with your change. @Terry
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26205>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 9ed3cd8ba052b395ab50692bb65988b065d68e27 by Joannah Nanjekye in
branch 'master':
bpo-26205: Specify the number of nested scopes (GH-21324)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9ed3cd8ba052b395ab50692bb65988
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Merged, this can be closed if there is consesus.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26205>
___
___
Pytho
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset d12af71047f0eae86440654d3ea74c032c7c3558 by Joannah Nanjekye in
branch 'master':
bpo-28681: Clarify multiple function names in the tutorial (GH-21340)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d12af71047f0eae86440654d3ea74c
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 7ceb3e3ffc8ee00551df2245544eb60f7debf3af by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.8':
bpo-26205: Specify the number of nested scopes (GH-21324) (GH-21342)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/7ceb3e3ffc8ee00551df2245544eb6
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 3f4a9fd912fc6d4f5ee2b49bfef979cc7d457848 by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.9':
bpo-26205: Specify the number of nested scopes (GH-21324) (GH-21341)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/3f4a9fd912fc6d4f5ee2b49bfef979
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 00c09f06a4cf1e352c6ab0c9b9e6074e52f44ae1 by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.9':
bpo-28681: Clarify multiple function names in the tutorial (GH-21340) (GH-21343)
https://github.com/python/cpyt
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
New changeset 6790f9badda47c7aa0fe4b0b5f090d6ca0c477d5 by Miss Islington (bot)
in branch '3.8':
bpo-28681: Clarify multiple function names in the tutorial (GH-21340) (GH-21344)
https://github.com/python/cpyt
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
This is marked 2.7 is it still relevant?
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
I think the same reasoning in the discussion from this thread:
https://bugs.python.org/issue41018 applies to this too.
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39375>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
The function is_annotated() in symtable is not documented. Am using this
opportunity to also add docstrings to the methods that didnot have them already.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 373200
nosy: docs@python
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
title: Document is_annotated() in the symtable module -> Document is_annotate()
in symtable and update doc strings
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +20514
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21369
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
The method get_id() in the symtable module is implemented and documented but
not tested.
--
messages: 373201
nosy: nanjekyejoannah
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Add a test for get_id() in the symtable module
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +20515
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21370
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
The Pr should sort this. I will merge it tommorrow if there is no objection.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment:
Looks like this should be closed as the submitted PR was merged. Just following
up for consesus.
--
nosy: +nanjekyejoannah
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
New submission from Joannah Nanjekye :
symbol.sym_name was already removed yet still documented in library/symbol.rst.
I suggest completely removing the docs too since the module is non-existing.
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 373261
nosy: nanjekyejoannah
priority: normal
Change by Joannah Nanjekye :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +20526
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21381
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
101 - 200 of 379 matches
Mail list logo