Guido Treutwein added the comment:
Yurys answer and resolution misses the point. Nobody complained about the await
operator. Fact is, that in the _power_ operator (chapter 6.5) as base
specification now "await" is given. This is likely to be an inadvertent copy of
the previous chap
Guido Treutwein added the comment:
I'm with David here, in that a change would improve ease of comprehension:
I still find it strange, that the grammar symbol has the same name as the
keyword (or in the proposed version keyword+'expr'), which is never done on
more widely used
