Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I understand you, Alexander, but this problem (as is the previous) **doesn't
have anything to do with the fake module**.
It would happen even if I didn't have it. Why does it only strike this test,
then? Because of my usage of __file__ to compar
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I can confirm Robert's findings.
1) The documentation of C_RETURN and C_EXCEPTION indeed says None while the
function object is passed. This is seen in the implementation of the C_TRACE
macro in Python/ceval.c
2) The arg of RETURN can be indeed NULL
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Alexander,
Yes, I plan to work on this during the weekend (which starts tomorrow where I'm
at).
Georg,
Are you having plans for writing comprehensive tests for the module, or is this
just a placeholder? I have no problem merging with this change, b
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
TestCoverage.test_coverage_ignore fails when running in verbose mode ("python
regrtest.py -v test_trace", or directly "python test_trace.py"), because it
attempts to compare stdout.getvalue() with the empty string, while verbose
places o
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
The test class added into test_trace.py in issue 3821 fails in verbose mode
(see my message http://bugs.python.org/msg113076). I'm merging that class into
my larger test_trace.py and will fix this problem, unless you guys have other
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I'm attaching a new patch for unit-testing of trace.py. Changes:
1. Fixed the problems that caused failures when run through regrtest
2. Added the test class from issue 3821
3. Removed the fake module creation, replacing it with a directory
New submission from Eli Bendersky :
eli...@eliben-desktop:~/python_src/svn-27-maint/Lib/test$ py27 regrtest.py
test_complex.py
test_complex
test test_complex failed -- Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/eliben/python_src/27-maint/Lib/test/test_complex.py", lin
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
components: +Tests
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9531>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Sorry, I didn't build (make) the python executable before reporting. Everything
works, so I'm closing the issue.
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I think it makes sense to commit the same patch to 2.7, is this planned?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
[attaching a new patch version]
1. Are you refering to Lib/test/tracedmodules/__init__.py? I did add it - it
appears in the patchfile. What do you mean?
2. Fixed
3. Fixed
4. I'm not sure. Tracing of the current file is also a common use case, and I
r
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
It appears to affect 2.7 as well (probably because of a back-port from py3k to
27-maint in revision 83421).
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Looking at Lib/test/regrtest.py:
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Simplification for findtestdir().
assert __file__ == os.path.abspath(sys.argv[0])
I'm not sure regrtest.py is prepared to be run from trace at all. Note that
this err
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Following the discussions on pydev and some private correspondence with Georg
Brandl, I'm attaching an updated patch.
Things changed:
1. Changes of :option: to ``...`` similar to previous patch
2. :program:`prog` :option:`opt` was changed to ``prog opt
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Eric, thanks for the catch and the fix. If there's anything else, just let me
know.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
+1, I've been bothered by this description of "optimization" for a long time.
Terry's patch LGTM
--
nosy: +eli.bendersky
___
Python tracker
<http://bug
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Serhiy, thanks for working on this! I didn't read the whole patch yet - will
tinker with it a bit more when applying. Did you prepare the patch vs. 3.3 or
default? The two are still synced and I'd be happy to apply it to both branches.
Now, the rea
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Henrik, there's no need to provide more information in 3.2 and 2.7 than in 3.3
and default. Could you just align your patches with those (i.e. same wording in
the documentation)?
--
___
Python tracker
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
No problems. You can go ahead and commit this patch to 3.3 and default, then. I
will review it post-commit, since I wanted to tweak some things around anyway.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
versions: +Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15083>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Henrik. Yes, I think the change in 3.3 was intentional in order to avoid
duplication that can be a source of errors. If ET.find() does exactly what
ET.getroot().find() does, it suffices to mention it with a link. Since Element
docs come first and arguably
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Great, thanks.
Now looking forward to the patch getting rid of the module-level globals. One
idea is explicitly pass the module into each testing class. The classes should
not rely on anything global in this respect
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
> Ezio Melotti added the comment:
>
> > The next logical step is to make all test classes in test_xml_etree
> > accept the ET module in some way and store it, using it to get classes
&g
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
moijes, did you address the review comments?
Does your patch apply to 3.2?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I'm not very knowledgeable in other XML modules, but I hate to see this patch
linger. Also it's a pre-requisite for #16986, it seems.
Serhiy, since the patch is large could you give a short summary of the things
it fixes? Note that the best approach
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Serhiy, OK - I'll look at #2175 first. But yes, Christian is right, let's wait
for the security issues to be resolved first.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
A minimal fix would be to update the documentation.
A more comprehensive fix would be to tweak ctypes to reject unions and
bit-fields when running on non-x86 (does this work for ARM and other non-Intel
archs?)
An even more comprehensive fix would be to make
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I wouldn't expend too much effort on older versions though. So unless it's
simple to adapt, IMHO 3.3+ is good enough.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
nosy: +eli.bendersky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16576>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I propose to start with the attached documentation fix (generated vs. 3.2 but
should be applied to all active branches).
A code fix has to be discussed more thoroughly because in theory some code
running only on x86-32 can rely on it and will break
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I propose to start with the attached documentation fix (generated vs. 3.2 but
should be applied to all active branches).
A code fix has to be discussed more thoroughly because in theory some code
running only on x86-32 can rely on it and will break
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg183596
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16576>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file29327/issue16576.docfix.1.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16576>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16576>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
> I haven't read the patch in detail but I think the reference to Java's
> threading model could probably be discarded. First, I don't know if it's
> still true, second, I don't think anyone cares :)
>
>
I agree. I
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Duplicate of #12768?
karl - feel free to review the patch submitted to that issue and offer your
insights.
--
nosy: +eli.bendersky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
New submission from Eli Bendersky:
While playing with ctypes a bit, I noticed a feature that doesn't appear to be
documented. Suppose I import the readdir_r function (assuming DIRENT is a
correctly declared ctypes.Structure):
DIR_p = c_void_p
DIRENT_p = POINTER(DIRENT)
DIRENT_pp = PO
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Doc patch for 3.2
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29340/issue17378.1.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc, theller
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17378>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
The patch addresses issue16575 as well
--
nosy: +theller
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16576>
___
___
Python-bug
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Raymond - which patch is it? You didn't specify the contributor in the commit.
What about the duplicate issue #12768 where someone also worked to supply a
patch?
Also, you've only committed this t
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Henrik, this patch fails to apply to 3.2
applying issue11367_branch32.patch
patching file Doc/library/xml.etree.elementtree.rst
Hunk #1 FAILED at 411
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
Doc/library/xml.etree.elementtree.rst.rej
patching file Lib
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Marc-Andre, Can this issue be closed or are the docs lacking in some way?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Gutzwiller, the [position] syntax means the Nth child *of its parent*. Since
you placed the second into , it's the first child of its parent. So the
library's behavior is correct here. Note:
>>> [e.text for e in xml.findall(&#
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Chris Calloway, would you like to pursue this issue further?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15518>
___
___
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Thanks David, the patch looks good. I will commit it with some slight
modifications and touch-ups shortly.
The issue of C extension docstrings vs. Python docstrings is an interesting
one. It's a shame that help() shows empty strings, and it's a sham
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
No, according to the devguide patches for Python have to be created with 'hg
diff' and applicable with 'hg patch'. I can fix the patch in a number of ways,
but I think it's important for a new contributor to learn how to generate a
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Chris, your reply seems to indicate that you're irritated for some reason, and
I'm not sure why.
I was simply going through my open issue backlog, and since this is something
I'd like to see fixed, I noticed that you said in October that you hav
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Thanks for the patches - committed with slight adaptations (in default branch
the internal documentation switched from comments to docstrings).
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected
status: open -&g
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
See also #17375
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12768>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
>
> Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
>
> > You didn't specify the contributor in the commit.
>
> I'm the contributor.
>
Oh, I see. I thought it's taken from o
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
nosy: +theller
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16575>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
moijes12, since Raymond went ahead and committed a patch to 2.7 in #17375, I
think patches to other versions should also be based on his patch. The most
constructive thing you can do at this point is review his changes in 2.7 and
help porting them to 3.x. Also
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Top/bottom is accepted and understood nomenclature when talking about stacks.
Think about a stack of plates in the kitchen. You put a new plate on top, you
take it out from top. That's it.
Now, lists are just one way to implement stacks, and printing th
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I actually find the growth direction confusing sometimes for the same reasons
(too much x86 assembly). This is why I wrote this blog post a while back -
mainly so I can always look at it and de-confuse myself:
http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2011/02/04/where-the
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
A lot of the code in the tests is devoted to building the tested directory tree
and populating it ( _setUpDirectories and related functions). You keep building
and deleting this tree for every running test.
I think that a better idea would be to just create
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Thanks, looks much better now. I left a couple of small comments in the code
review. Other than that, it makes sense to me to update the existing tests to
follow this scheme as well. Thanks!
On a related note, since you've obviously studied the fi
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Issue #17375 supersedes this one. Please post updated patches there.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12768>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I've opened a libffi issue in an attempt to get this fixed upstream:
https://github.com/atgreen/libffi/issues/33
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I agree the doc could be clearer and Ned's example is very good. However I'd go
one step forward and add a further elaboration of how the method works. This is
the current doc (in default branch):
Return a copy of the string where all tab char
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
David, would you like to pursue this further (figuring out how to make
docstrings show in help() without duplicating?)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
You can ask on the python-dev mailing list. It's possible that other Python
developers ran into a similar issue.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
It's better, although the distinction between "tab column" and "tab position"
is not entirely clear.
--
___
Python tracker
<http:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Thanks Antoine. This looks interesting - I'm somewhat swamped ATM but will try
to review the patch in the next few days.
Incidentally, since it is a new feature would it be worthwhile to discuss it on
python-
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Antoine, the patch LGTM. There's some more cleaning that needs to be done in
surrounding code, but I can do that later. Also I should probably update the
documentation with a bit more details.
Just add a NEWS entry when you commit.
Thanks for working on
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
LGTM!
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17670>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Thanks for the heads up Chris. Since I'm a bit busy myself lately, it's fine to
wait until you have time to complete the patch. I'll review it then.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
New submission from Eli Bendersky:
[this came up as part of the Enum discussions. Full details in this thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-May/126076.html]
namedtuple currently uses this code to obtain the __module__ for the class it
creates dynamically so that pickling
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file30191/ref435.py
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17947>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I don't see docs in the patch, but perhaps that should be a separate patch to
keep reviewing easier.
Also, Ethan, number the patch files in some way (like pep-435.1.patch,
pep-435.N.patch) as they go through rounds of reviews.
--
assignee: docs@p
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
A question that came up while reviewing the new enum code: "module" or
"module_name" for this extra argument? The former is shorter, but the latter is
more correct in a way.
--
___
P
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
OK, I sent another batch of reviews through the code review system - Ethan you
should've gotten an email about it.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum added the comment:
>
> Module, please. The class attribute is also called __module__ after all.
>
Makes sense. Thanks.
--
___
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Regarding module vs. module_name for the extra param in the functional API,
Guido rightly points out in issue 17941 that __module__ is the class attribute,
so "module" is a consistent choice.
--
___
Pyth
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
By the way, if anyone is willing to take on the documentation, that could be of
great help. It shouldn't be very hard since PEP 435 is extremely detailed. The
stdlib .rst doc would be the descriptions from PEP 435 plus a reference of the
exposed classes
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan added the comment:
>
> Two requests:
>
> 1. Lose the frame hack. With the explicit "module=__name__" API available,
> the implicit fragile magic isn't n
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
> 2. Mike Bayer (SQL Alchemy author) has requested the ability to derive a
> custom metaclass that turns off the Enums-with-members-are-final
> subclassing restriction (relaxing the rule that members of an enum are
> instances of that enum to "m
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Ethan, something is wrong with _StealthProperty. Well, two things. First, it's
way too general and can be cut to just what Enum needs. Second, this is enough
to make the tests pass:
class _StealthProperty():
"""
Returns the value
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Also, your test must run within the regrtest framework. Currently I get:
./python -mtest.regrtest test_enum
[1/1] test_enum
test test_enum failed -- Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/eliben/python-src/default/Lib/test/test_enum.py", li
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Benjamin, I guess you can just unlink the message from the issue? [and then
your clarification, and when again this message from me ;-)]
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Nick, could you open a separate issue for the frame hack discussion, like you
did for the other things? You can make this one depend on it, if you feel it's
a "blocker", but let's please not intermix
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Ethan, I pasted the minimized version to point out the problem; I fully agree
it should do the getattr lookup because otherwise it's very difficult to
understand what's going on. Let's keep exceptions for actual exceptional
situations and expl
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17963>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
For external APIs visible to user code, this can cause some compatibility
problems and users may need to at the very least re-compile this code. So -1
here.
For new external APIs, having const wherever appropriate should be considered
on a case by case basis
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Antoine, I was referring to the discussion linked earlier
(http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060689.html). Users
of the C API needed to recompile their code and also add preprocessor hacks to
make things compatible with C and C++, AFAIU
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
assignee: -> eli.bendersky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17989>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Yes, overwriting the Python classes with C classes is not an error, but the
original issue is legit. The error should be more immediately reported.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
The problem is that element_setattro is returning a wrong value for error -
NULL instead of -1. So the exception is set and is triggered on the next line
instead. Will fix for 3.3 and default branches
--
___
Python
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17989>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Fixed. Thanks for the report!
Python 3.4.0a0 (default:1b760f926846+9682241dc8fc+, May 18 2013, 07:52:49)
[GCC 4.6.3] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> impo
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
These "compatibility" names are likely to be remnants from the out-of-tree xml
etree implementation before it made it into the stdlib. I think they can simply
be removed in 3.4, as they're not docu
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I committed a fix with a simplified test. Thanks for the contribution, Aaron.
Also, to get your patches committed directly you need to sign the Python
contributor agreement.
--
___
Python tracker
<h
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
> +1 for deletion of them (even in 3.3.3).
Hmm, I don't think I agree. If someone relies on this thing for some obscure
reason, breaking when the switch to 3.4 is made is still less abrasive than a
break in a maintenance version. Since this isn'
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Aaron, could you please sign the PSF CLA
(http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/) - this will make it accepting
patches from you easier.
Other than that, I agree it's a legit patch. The alternative would be to fix
_elementtree to actually
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
versions: -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17988>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Eli Bendersky :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
1101 - 1200 of 1229 matches
Mail list logo
