New submission from Kumar Aditya :
The attached PR speeds up bytearray creation from list and tuple.
Benchmark (uses pyperf):
-
import pyperf
runner = pyperf.Runner()
runner.timeit(name="bench bytearray",
stmt=&quo
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46953>
___
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
type: -> performance
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python
New submission from Kumar Aditya :
Currently, _SelectorSocketTransport transport creates a copy of the data before
sending which in case of large amount of data, can create multiple giga bytes
copies of data before sending.
Script demonstrating current behavior
New submission from Kumar Aditya :
Benchmark and results are attached in the PR.
--
messages: 415129
nosy: gvanrossum, kumaraditya303
priority: normal
pull_requests: 29965
severity: normal
status: open
title: Speed up iteration of bytes and bytearray
type: performance
versions: Python
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +29970
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31871
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +kumaraditya303
nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0
pull_requests: +30108
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32020
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.p
Kumar Aditya added the comment:
@asvetlov Do you have any insight for this issue?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43884>
___
___
Python-bug
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
components: +Interpreter Core
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
pull_requests: +30160
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32073
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
pull_requests: +30185
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32107
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
resolution: fixed ->
status: closed -> open
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46429>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Kumar Aditya added the comment:
With this change, Github Actions fails first time and it passes in the second
rerun of running asyncio tests.
See https://github.com/python/cpython/runs/5682275663?check_suite_focus=true
and main branch.
--
nosy: +kumaraditya303
New submission from Kumar Aditya :
Specialize call for c functions with METH_FASTCALL|METH_KEYWORDS flags.
It is the second largest PRECALL specialization failure as per the stats.
See
https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/blob/main/stats.md#specialization-attempts-10
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
pull_requests: +30230
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32152
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue47127>
___
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46429>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Kumar Aditya added the comment:
@asvetlov This is bug no longer exists, on main branch this is the output and
it does not hangs:
DEBUG:asyncio:Using selector: EpollSelector
True
--
nosy: +asvetlov, kumaraditya
___
Python tracker
<ht
Kumar Aditya added the comment:
Most of the static variables were removed by GH-31366 so I closed those PRs as
they were outdated, however some static variable still exist.
--
nosy: +kumaraditya
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
resolution: -> duplicate
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> ProactorEventLoop doesn't support stdin/stdout nor files with
connect_read_pipe/connect_write_pipe
___
Pytho
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +kumaraditya303
nosy_count: 7.0 -> 8.0
pull_requests: +27986
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29749
___
Python tracker
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
nosy: +kumaraditya303
nosy_count: 6.0 -> 7.0
pull_requests: +28009
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29772
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
nosy: +kumaraditya303
nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0
pull_requests: +28024
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29788
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
pull_requests: +28047
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29814
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue45
Kumar Aditya added the comment:
I would like to tackle this, I'll work on this from next week.
--
nosy: +kumaraditya303
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Kumar Aditya added the comment:
I have installed VS 2022 with v143 of MSVC.
I get this error when compiling
```console
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
Studio\2022\Community\MSBuild\Microsoft\VC\v170\Microsoft.CppBuild.ta
rgets(436,5): error MSB8020: The build tools for Visual Studio 2019
Kumar Aditya added the comment:
Thanks Steve, installing v142 is indeed my current workaround but would be
great to support v143 as it is the latest version.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, 21:09 Steve Dower wrote:
>
> Steve Dower added the comment:
>
> An easy workaround for people
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +28118
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29894
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +kumaraditya303
nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0
pull_requests: +28127
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29903
___
Python tracker
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +kumaraditya303
nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0
pull_requests: +28227
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30003
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.p
Change by Kumar Aditya :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +kumaraditya303
nosy_count: 4.0 -> 5.0
pull_requests: +28230
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30006
___
Python tracker
Changes by Aditya Hase :
--
pull_requests: +2891
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30304>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Aditya Hase added the comment:
Hi, I'm new to python development community.
I've created a GitHub PR that fixes this issue.
--
nosy: +adityahase
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Changes by Aditya Hase :
--
pull_requests: +2893
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30304>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Aditya Hase added the comment:
I've fixed that.
--
versions: +Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30304>
___
___
Aditya Hase added the comment:
Should I create a Github PR with given patch? If so, how do I give credit to
the original author?
--
nosy: +adityahase
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22
Change by Aditya Shankar :
--
nosy: Aditya Shankar
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: display index on Index
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36
Change by Aditya Shankar :
--
components: +Interpreter Core
title: display index on Index -> display index on IndexError
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
New submission from Aditya Shankar :
considering a list of 5 elements, if the 6th element is asked, the Interpreter
would raise IndexError: list index out of range,
I think It'd be better if it actually said what the invalid index is
Improvement benefits:
*quicker debugging of faulty p
Aditya Shankar added the comment:
closed as this is a duplicate for https://bugs.python.org/issue18162
--
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
New submission from Aditya Shankar :
Problem: multiline strings are a pain to represent (other than of-course in
docstrings), representing a multiline string inside a function looks something
like this -
def foo():
# some code
...
...
# some code
text = """
Change by Aditya Shankar :
--
resolution: postponed -> duplicate
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36628>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
New submission from Aditya Sane :
When initializing a dictionary with dict.fromkeys, if an object is used as
initial value, then the value is taken by reference instead of by value.
This results in incorrect behavior since Python doesn't have "by reference" or
pointers by de
Aditya Atluri added the comment:
I have found a hack for the issue.
First, install Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable Package.
Second, copy the msvcr100.dll to C:\Python33\libs.
Reason: During compilation, the directory for linking is C:\Python44\libs. Both
-lpython and -lmsvcr100 are
New submission from Aditya Atluri:
I am trying to build c extensions in windows using mingw32. The file hello.c
works fine with 2.7 but, errors are poping up in 3.3.
Attachments:
[1] log.txt : The errors
[2] hello.c : The C file
[3] setup.py: The setup file
The command I used in cmd is
Aditya Kedia added the comment:
Right.. Looks good.
--
nosy: +TheAdityaKedia
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13498>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by aditya gupta :
--
nosy: +aditya gupta
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26188>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Bhaskara Aditya Sriram added the comment:
I would like work on this, but I'm very new to fixing bugs. Could someone
please help me on how to proceed with this bug. Thank You in advance
--
nosy: +adityasriram.b
___
Python tracker
&
201 - 248 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
