[issue10915] Make the PyGILState API compatible with multiple interpreters

2011-01-15 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: A TLS based approach would presumably allow an embedding application like mod_wsgi to tinker with the state of threads created by naive modules that are unaware of the existence of subinterpreters. That said, I don't see anything that prevents us from pur

[issue10912] PyObject_RichCompare differs in behaviour from PyObject_RichCompareBool ; difference not noted in documentation

2011-01-15 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Indeed. I was actually wondering if it would be worth trying to write up a section for the language reference to describe the cases where a Python implementation is *expected* to assume reflexive equality. We (IMO) have a problem at the moment due to

[issue10915] Make the PyGILState API compatible with multiple interpreters

2011-01-16 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: There's no point improving the multiple interpreter support if it doesn't help applications that are currently broken because of that lack of support. I believe the patch as currently proposed actually makes things *worse*. With "autoTLSk

[issue10915] Make the PyGILState API compatible with multiple interpreters

2011-01-16 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Added Mark Hammond to the nosy list, as the original author and implementor of PEP 311 (which added the GILState APIs). Mark, since your PEP deliberately punted on multiple interpreter support, feel free to take yourself off the list again. If you spot any

[issue10915] Make the PyGILState API compatible with multiple interpreters

2011-01-17 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Graham - the cases you describe are the things I was saying don't currently work in my post and wouldn't be helped by Antoine's patch. Your thoughts on how we could possibly make it work actually parallel mine (although there may be fun and ga

[issue10914] Python sub-interpreter test

2011-01-17 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: I like the idea of adding these tests as well. Probably worth bringing up on python-dev - folks like Tarek should definitely be able to help with alternative ways of building a test application for this. There is also always the possibility of writing it in

[issue10926] Some Invalid Relative Imports succeed in Py 3.0 & 3.1 [& correctly fail in 3.2rc1]

2011-01-17 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Yeah, 7902 was a bug that tried to do an absolute import if an explicit relative import failed to find anything (i.e. it had inherited the old implicit relative import fallback, which was entirely inappropriate for the new use case). Since the significant

[issue10915] Make the PyGILState API compatible with multiple interpreters

2011-01-17 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Good point - consider that comment revised to refer to the GIL acquisition counter in the thread state struct. It may just be a matter of having ThreadState_Swap complain loudly if the gilstate_counter isn't set to a value it knows how to h

[issue3080] Full unicode import system

2011-01-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Victor, could you please create a Reitveld review for this? The auto-review creator can't cope with the Git diffs. -- nosy: +ncoghlan ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/i

[issue3080] Full unicode import system

2011-01-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: OK - I'll wait until that is ready before digging into this. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue3080> ___ ___

[issue3080] Full unicode import system

2011-01-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: After applying the patch, doing a make clean and rebuild, I found that test_importlib fails with a segmentation fault, but the default test suite otherwise runs without error (that's on Linux with a UTF-8 filesystem, though). I'll see how a -uall

[issue3080] Full unicode import system

2011-01-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: As for the more limited run, I get a clean run with -uall except for the segfault in test_importlib. I'll switch to a pydebug build and see how a verbose run of that test fares. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue3080] Full unicode import system

2011-01-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: I haven't investigated in detail yet, but this is the final line showing the failing test: test_module (importlib.test.builtin.test_loader.LoaderTests) ... Segmentation fault -- ___ Python tracker

[issue3080] Full unicode import system

2011-01-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Oops, missed that post - that was indeed the problem. With that fixed, tests are all good on this system. I'll give the patch a look anyway, but I'm going to have trouble diagnosing things that don't fail on my development machine. As far as t

[issue3080] Full unicode import system

2011-01-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:08 AM, STINNER Victor wrote: > I should maybe add some unit tests for non-ASCII module paths and non-ASCII > module names :-) Indeed. There are a few tests in test_runpy that could be adapted to that task fairly easily (it creat

[issue11011] More functools functions

2011-01-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: For flip, const and identity I agree there are already better ways to handle them using either itertools or comprehension syntax. The problem I have with trampoline is that it depends on the function's *return values* being defined in a certain way

[issue11015] Bring test.support docs up to date

2011-01-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan : The test.support docs are there to help CPython devs with writing good unit tests more easily. There are a few additions we've made in recent years that haven't made it into the .rst file, so it is easy to miss useful tools if you don't go

[issue11011] More functools functions

2011-01-26 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: How the conversion from a recursive algorithm to an iterative one works depends on the specific algorithm involved. A trampoline does the job for tail calls, but not necessarily any other recursive algorithm. Factorial actually has a fairly trivial iterative

[issue10848] Move test.regrtest from getopt to argparse

2011-01-26 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: As I recall, STDTESTS is there to check we have a basically functioning interpreter (i.e. the compiler works, etc). The idea is that if any of those fail, everything else is likely to go belly up as well. If regrtest is being used to run some other set of

[issue7659] Attribute assignment on object() instances raises wrong exception

2011-01-26 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Object instances don't get a __dict__ by default to save the space the pointer and dict instance would require. Most builtins are missing that pointer. It is also the main memory saving provided by the use of __slots__. As far as AttributeError vs Type

[issue7659] Attribute assignment on object() instances raises wrong exception

2011-01-26 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Along the lines of RDM's last post, see: http://code.activestate.com/recipes/52308-the-simple-but-handy-collector-of-a-bunch-of-named/ Or, if you do a few web searches for terms like "bethard coghlan namespaces" or "bethard generic objects

[issue11015] Bring test.support docs up to date

2011-01-28 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: verbose isn't a boolean at all - it's an integer. You can supply it multiple times to bump the logging level up even higher than normal. ~/devel/py3k/Lib/test$ grep "verbose >" *.py regrtest.py:if self.verbose >

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

2011-01-28 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: There isn't really much "-m test" can do to flag this - multiprocessing is making assumptions about the meaning of __file__ that may be flat out invalid when -m is used to execute the main module. Fixing that properly is going to requi

[issue11049] add tests for test.support

2011-01-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: test_warnings actually includes sanity checks for import_fresh_module - they could be adapted into a separate unit test easily enough. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

2011-01-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: "Useless" is a rather strong word. Every change we've made to the import system (or, more accurately, the main module identification system) has been backed up with decent use cases - nearly all of the subsequent problems can be traced back to

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

2011-01-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: (Replaced patch file to fix a typo in a comment) -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20603/issue10845_mitigation.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

2011-01-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file20601/issue10845_mitigation.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10845> ___ ___ Pytho

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

2011-01-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Georg, it would be very good to have this fix in for RC2. Otherwise any use of multiprocessing in conjunction with zipfile, package or directory execution will fail on Windows in 3.2. -- assignee: -> georg.brandl priority: critical -> release b

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

2011-01-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: __main__.py files aren't like ordinary modules - they should *not* be defining classes or anything like that. Instead, they should be treated as if the entire file was implicitly inside an "if __name__ == '__main__':" clause - when

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

2011-01-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: To answer Antoine's question directly: With the patch, it works just as well as multiprocessing on Windows currently does if the objects marshalled between parent and child refer to classes defined inside a "if __name__ == '__main__':&

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

2011-01-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Committed for 3.2 in r88247. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10845> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub

[issue11071] What's New review comments

2011-01-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan : Reviewing the What's New docs, this seemed like the easiest way to give Raymond a list of things I noticed: - first sentence in the "ast" module section needs rewording (currently includes fragments from a couple of different phrasings)

[issue11071] What's New review comments

2011-01-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: A couple more in the Build and CAPI section: - "The is a new function" should be "There is a new function" - "The PyUnicode_CompareWithASCIIString() now" either needs to drop the "The" or add "function" before

[issue11071] What's New review comments

2011-01-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Another significant logging change: the addition of the "style" parameter for Formatter objects (allowing the use of str.format and string.Template style substitution instead of percent formatting) --

[issue11071] What's New review comments

2011-01-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: The last two logging changes potentially worth mentioning that I noticed: - simple callables can now be supplied as logging filters (see the version 3.2 note in http://docs.python.org/dev/library/logging#filter-objects) - the logging API docs now include a

[issue11071] What's New review comments

2011-01-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: I was wrong, I found one more potentially notable logging change: http://docs.python.org/dev/library/logging#logging.setLogRecordFactory -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11

[issue11071] What's New review comments

2011-01-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Adding Vinay, given the number of logging changes in 3.2 that don't appear to be in the What's New yet (the only logging change noted there at the moment is the inclusion of PEP 391) -- nosy: +vinay.sajip

[issue9931] test_ttk_guionly hangs on XP5

2011-01-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- priority: normal -> high ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue9931> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscri

[issue11071] What's New review comments

2011-01-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Correct docs links for LogRecord attributes section: http://docs.python.org/dev/library/logging#logrecord-attributes -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11

[issue8998] add crypto routines to stdlib

2011-02-01 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- nosy: +ncoghlan ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue8998> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue10971] python Lib/test/regrtest.py -R 3:3: test_zipimport_support fails

2011-02-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: My fix for the issues with reloading of the _ssl module meant that a couple of temporary modules weren't getting cleared out of sys.modules properly, thus confusing the second and later runs of affected tests. Attached patch adds explicit removal calls fo

[issue10971] python Lib/test/regrtest.py -R 3:3: test_zipimport_support fails

2011-02-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Helps to add the patch rather than the whole file... -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20702/issue10971_temp_module_cleanup ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10

[issue10971] python Lib/test/regrtest.py -R 3:3: test_zipimport_support fails

2011-02-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file20701/test_zipimport_support.py ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10971> ___ ___ Pytho

[issue10971] python Lib/test/regrtest.py -R 3:3: test_zipimport_support fails

2011-02-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Fixed for 3.2 in r88368 (no backport needed, since the older test suites didn't exhibit the original problem with the _ssl module reloading) -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tra

[issue10971] python Lib/test/regrtest.py -R 3:3: test_zipimport_support fails

2011-02-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: (Georg reviewed the patch after I mentioned it to him on IRC) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10971> ___ ___

[issue11165] Document PyEval_Call* functions

2011-02-09 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan : There are currently undocumented PyEval_Call* equivalents to a number of the PyObject_Call* functions. Since there are resources out there on the web that direct people to use the currently undocumented PyEval functions, it would be good to document those

[issue11165] Document PyEval_Call* functions

2011-02-09 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Removed the easy tag, since this may involve some python-dev discussion as to where to put them in C API docs (they don't really fit in any of the current sections). Perhaps an "advanced APIs" section, for things that most C extension

[issue5231] Change format of a memoryview

2011-02-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: It is, but keep issue 10181 in mind (since that may lead to some restructuring of the memoryview code, potentially leading to a need to update your patch). -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue5

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: I'm still not comfortable with a convention that relies on *clients* of the PEP 3118 API not mucking with the internals of the Py_buffer struct. I'm *much* happier with the rule based on malloc/free semantics where the *pointer* passed to PyObject

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: As far as the question of re-exporting the underlying view or not goes, I agree having "memoryview(a)" potentially refer to different underlying memory from "a" itself (because the source object has changed since the first view was expor

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: I should note that the idea of using a Py_buffer's "internal" field as the unique ID rather than the Py_buffer's address does have some merit, but I still overall prefer a design that places fewer constrai

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> I'm still not comfortable with a convention that relies on *clients* >> of the PEP 3118 API not mucking with the internals of the Py_buffer >> struct. > > Which clients? Th

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Another idea we may want to revisit is the PyManagedBuffer concept, which would be a true PyObject that existed solely to simplify sharing of Py_buffer structs. If memoryview used such an object internally, then copying and slicing would be quite simple - just

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: OK, to summarise that revisit into a coherent proposal: 1. Add "PyManagedBuffer" as an even lower level wrapper around Py_buffer. The only thing this would support is doing GetBuffer on construction and ReleaseBuffer when destroyed (or when explicitl

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: On further reflection, I realised point 4 in that suggestion isn't reliable in a formal sense. Consider: with memoryview(a) as m: m[:] The slice won't reference the buffer again, but isn't guaranteed by the language definition to ha

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: The managed buffer needs to be a separate object so that multiple memoryview objects can share it. Essentially, we would end up with two APIs - the raw Py_buffer API and the higher level PyManagedBuffer one. C extensions would have the choice of using the low

[issue10181] Problems with Py_buffer management in memoryobject.c (and elsewhere?)

2011-02-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: If it helps, one way to think of it is that post-redesign, the PyManagedBuffer would be the "real" API object, with Py_buffer merely a way for data exporters to provide the information needed to initialise the managed buffer properly. (That actua

[issue11071] What's New review comments

2011-02-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Éric Araujo wrote: > It appears that Misc/NEWS in 3.2 lists the new functions under the 3.1 > section, among other strange differences. "new in 3.2" changes are relative to 3.1, while 2.7 is relative to 2.6. Th

[issue2831] Adding start to enumerate()

2008-05-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Note that this functionality is currently available as follows: >>> from itertools import count >>> list(zip(count(3), 'abcdefg') [(3, 'a'), (4, 'b'), (5, 'c'), (6, 'd&#

[issue2831] Adding start to enumerate()

2008-05-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Mentioning the zip(count(start), itr) version in the enumerate() docs may be a good idea though. (And of course, in 2.x, it should be izip() rather than zip() to preserve the memory efficiency of enu

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I've attached a sample ProxyBase class that delegates all of the special methods handled by weakref.proxy (as well as the tp_oct and tp_hex slots, which weakref.proxy ignores). While there are other special methods in CPython (e.g

[issue2934] set() comparisons do not play well with others

2008-05-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The rich compare implementation for set objects raises TypeError directly instead of returning NotImplemented to allow the other type involved in the comparison a chance at handling the operation. -- messages: 67152 nosy: nc

[issue2934] set() comparisons do not play well with others

2008-05-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Eh, never mind, raising the TypeError explicitly is necessary due to the misbehaviour of the default comparisons in 2.x. I'll work around the problem in my test case. -- resolution: -> invalid status:

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Attached a new version of the module, along with a unit test file. The unit tests caught a bug in the __gt__ implementation. I've also changed the name to ProxyMixin as suggested by Adam and switched to using a normal __init__ method

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10390/test_typetools.py Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10385/typetools.py Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-22 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Added documentation, and assigned to Barry as release manager for 2.6/3.0. Also bumped to 'release blocker' status because I think the loss of classic classes transparent proxying capabilities is a fairly substantial issue

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-22 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Also changed to a library issue instead of a docs issue. -- components: +Library (Lib) -Documentation Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-22 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Correct, this isn't intended to be an all-singing, all-dancing proxy implementation - it's meant to be a simple solution for local proxies that want to change the behaviour of a few operations while leaving other operations

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-23 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Specialised? What's specialised about it? It's designed to serve as a replacement for the simple delegation use cases that are currently met quite adequately by classic classes, since those are no longer

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-23 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: As to the rationale for having it in the standard library: it's because of the coupling with the implementation of the type() builtin. If a new slot is added to type() that the interpreter may access without consulting __getattrib

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-23 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: The way to override _deref/_unwrap is to make _target a property on a ProxyMixin subclass (which reminds me, I want to put in an explicit test case to make sure that works as intended - I'll use the weakref-proxy-in-Python as the

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10438/typetools.py Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10389/typetools.py Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10390/test_typetools.py Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10402/typetools.rst Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Updated test cases and documentation to cover use of a descriptor for _target in a subclass, and uploaded most recent local copies of all 3 files. -- keywords: +patch versions: +Python 3.0 -Python 2.2.1, Python 2.2.2, Python

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-05-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10439/test_typetools.py Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.

[issue3036] docs - print() example wrong in whatsnew

2008-06-04 Thread Nick Veitch
New submission from Nick Veitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: In the whatsnew/3.0.html doc, the example for print is the wrong way around. Current version reads: * The :func:`print` function doesn't support the "softspace" feature of the old ``print`` statement. For e

[issue3042] Add PEP 8 compliant aliases to threading module

2008-06-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PEP 371 highlighted the non-PEP 8 compliant nature of the threading API. Since part of that PEP involves updating the multiprocessing API to be PEP 8 compliant before addition the standard library, the threading API should also be upda

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I've attached the latest version of the module as an actual patch against Python SVN. It differs slightly from the last version uploaded as separate files, in that in-place operations on a proxied object will no longer strip the pr

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Note that I'll be offline for the next few days, so I want be able to respond to any comments until some time next week. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.py

[issue3042] Add PEP 8 compliant aliases to threading module

2008-06-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: The code changes in the patch look pretty good to me (although you probably want to actually use @wraps inside _old_api!) There are obviously also documentation and test suite changes that will be

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Ah, that would answer my #XXX comment regarding that in the patch. Agreed, the best answer will be to factor out the _rewrap operation into a new class method. (Next week though...) ___ Python t

[issue3042] Add PEP 8 compliant aliases to threading module

2008-06-08 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I'd still be inclined to put a @wraps(meth) decorator on the definition of the wrapper function (and then override to the supplied name afterwards) - remember that functools.wraps is a decorator factory rather than a decorator its

[issue2517] Error when printing an exception containing a Unicode string

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: As far as I am concerned, the implementation of PyObject_Unicode in object.c has a bug in it: it should NEVER be retrieving __unicode__ from the instance object. The implementation of PyObject_Format in abstract.c shows the correct

[issue2517] Error when printing an exception containing a Unicode string

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Here's the key difference with the way PyObject_Format looks up the pseudo-slot method: PyObject *method = _PyType_Lookup(Py_TYPE(obj), str__format__); _PyType_Loo

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Unfortunately, the standard library doesn't tend to do this kind of delegation (aside from weakref.proxy, which implements the equivalent code directly in C), so there isn't a lot of standard library code that will benefit

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: bleh, "application independent decision" in my last post should read "interpreter implementation dependent decision". ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: and "__print__" was meant to be "__unicode__"... ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: And (mainly for Barry's benefit) a quick recap of why I think this is necessary for Python 3.0: For performance or correctness reasons, the interpreter is permitted to bypass the normal __getattribute__ when looking up special meth

[issue2517] Error when printing an exception containing a Unicode string

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Minor cleanup of Simon's patch attached - aside from a couple of unneeded whitespace changes, it all looks good to me. Not checking it in yet, since it isn't critical for this week's beta release - I'd prefer to lea

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: New patch (proxymixin.diff) uploaded that correctly delegates __format__, as well as using an overridable return_inplace() method to generate the inplace operation return values. The _target attribute has also been made formally part

[issue643841] New class special method lookup change

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Note that I don't make any promises about the correctness of the ReST formatting in that latest patch - my Doc build is misbehaving at the moment, and I haven't had a chance to look at what

[issue2517] Error when printing an exception containing a Unicode string

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I'm not sure adding a dedicated method slot would be worth the hassle involved - Py3k drop backs to just the tp_str slot anyway, and the only thing you gain with a tp_unicode slot over _PyType_Lookup of a __unicode__ attribute

[issue3182] 2to3 Slight Patch

2008-06-23 Thread Nick Edds
New submission from Nick Edds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This is a small patch to the 2to3 tool, replacing some calls to isinstance (x,y) with type(x) is y in the file pytree.py. Although there is only a slight performance increase for each time this change is made, the recursive nature of p

[issue3190] Pydoc should ignore __package__ attributes

2008-06-24 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Pydoc doesn't display the standard special attributes for packages and modules (__name__, __file__, __path__). It shouldn't display PEP 361's new __package__ attribute either. -- assignee: ncoghlan components: L

[issue3182] 2to3 Slight Patch

2008-06-24 Thread Nick Edds
Nick Edds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I don't think the improvement falls in margin of error, but maybe I'm wrong. The problem was that even when just run on a single file, isinstance was being called upwards of 100,000 times. I guess it doesn't merit inclusion o

[issue2235] __eq__ / __hash__ check doesn't take inheritance into account

2008-06-27 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Amaury's patch doesn't currently remove the new-in-2.6 code that turns "tp_hash = NULL" at the C level into "__hash__ = None" at the Python level. I suspect that will prove to be a problem (and may be the c

[issue3218] 2to3 Fix_imports optimization

2008-06-27 Thread Nick Edds
New submission from Nick Edds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This is an optimization in pytree.py specifically for the bare_name pattern from fix_imports.py. It also has the isinstance change I previously suggested piggybacked onto it. Because the bare_name pattern is so massive (764 nodes!), it i

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >