Mark Lawrence added the comment:
A patch is attached to #1375011.
--
dependencies: -Improper handling of duplicate cookies
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> Improper handling of duplicat
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Hmm. There should be a configure-time test for 'round'. Could you look for a
line something like:
checking for round... yes
in the configure output and tell me whether you've got a 'yes' or a 'no' there?
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Ah. Reading your second message more closely, you're presumably getting a 'no'
there. Could you double check that 'HAVE_ROUND' is not defined in pyconfig.h?
In that case, what's supposed to happen is that there's a subs
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114296.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114327.
--
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue902151>
___
___
Python-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114256.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114373.
--
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1015254>
___
___
Python-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114390.
--
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1058305>
___
___
Python-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114485.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue902151>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1015254>
___
___
Pyth
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1058305>
___
___
Pyth
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
> ... change all hash values to be of Py_ssize_t values rather than C longs ...
Yes, please! (Provided this change can go in before 3.2.) For the numeric
types at least, this should be a straightforward adjustment.
And while we're at it, we could
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Thanks for the patch!
Comments:
(1) Shouldn't 'reverse=True' be omitted in the second doc addition?
(2) I'd also suggest adding a brief comment about what this means for distinct,
but equal, objects; otherwise it's not really obvi
Mark Hirota added the comment:
Yes, I'd be interested in this functionality. Anything that makes it more
flexible to use with a wide variety of zipfiles (even bad ones :D) allows for
increased reusability.
Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114328.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114998.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Nor reply to msg114679.
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1172011>
___
___
Python-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114985.
--
resolution: -> invalid
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Senthil/John has this simply slipped under the radar?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1520
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch appears to be way out of date. Is there any interest in the concept
of this patch, has something similar already been done or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Brian/Tim any comments on this, the patch contains C code that I'm not
qualified to comment on.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, brian.curtin, tim.golden
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
What is the status of this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
title: User-agent header added by an opener is "frozen" -> Urllib2 user-agent
header added by an opener is "frozen"
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1,
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Does any core committer fancy reviewing the 18 attached patches? :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1599
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Senthil: could you review the attached patch please?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4733>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
> Of course, there are subtle implications of how it will be implemented
Indeed. Ideally, as you mention, the implementation would only use __lt__ (as
with sort and bisect). I think that constraint only leaves one reasonable
choice: namely, max and min
Changes by Mark Dickinson :
--
assignee: -> mark.dickinson
nosy: +mark.dickinson
priority: normal -> high
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg113202.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No reply to msg114140.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The URL referenced in msg54124 gives a 404. It is also used as the
property_encoding in the sax handler module. Could this be fixed in 3.2 or can
this issue be closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't believe that a build issue raised almost 4 years ago against 2.5 is
still an issue today.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://b
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This has already been implemented.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still valid, can it be closed as out of date or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't believe that a build issue relating to 2.6 is still valid over two
years later.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is the attached patch still valid?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4837>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
A one line fix is given in msg80370, can this be applied,should the issue be
closed or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: +Distutils2 -Distutils
nosy: +eric.araujo
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I assume that people are still interested in this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Hum, a low priority interpreter core crash, would anyone like to comment?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
assignee: georg.brandl -> d...@python
nosy: +d...@python
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6893>
___
___
Python-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem on Linux?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7059>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The line in question has been like that since r42847 i.e. when the file came
into existence.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Were these test failures fixed prior to the full release of 2.7 in which case
this can be closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can this be closed as a duplicate of #2537?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1633
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've tried to see if this is still an issue but frankly can't make head nor
tail out of it :( Any locale gurus up for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4837>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1648890>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem with later versions of Python and/or the quoted OSes?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't believe that this is still an issue over 3 1/2 years on.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've assumed this is still a problem on OS X.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
title: print >> f, "Hello" produces no error: normal? -> OS X print >> f,
"Hello" produces no error: normal?
versions: +Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone with a Linux box try the latest patch please.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1653457>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've been chopping and changing versions recently and haven't had any problems.
@Brian/Tim any comments?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, brian.curtin, tim.golden
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
assignee: georg.brandl -> d...@python
nosy: +d...@python
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1661
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Should this be left with AMK or should it be reassigned to d...@python?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1665
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone with install and/or build experience please confirm or deny that
this is a problem with supported versions of Python.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone with an HP-UX box please see if this is still a problem with
currently supported versions of Python.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Senthil should this be assigned to your good self?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1675
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As there has been a lot of support for the attached patch what is needed to
take this forward?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1675
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could someone with commit privileges please take a look at the patch, thanks.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1676
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could someone with commit privileges please take this forward?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1677
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: +Library (Lib) -None
stage: -> unit test needed
type: -> feature request
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't reproduce this problem on Windows Vista with any of the current
maintainance branches of Python using the interactive prompt from the command
line.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone please comment on msg114316 as I'm out of my depth here, thanks.
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm unsure as to whether this is a feature request or a behaviour problem,
anyone? Regardless could a core dev take a look at the patch which involves
changes to the API for PyOS_InputHook, see msg68638.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test n
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This has been fixed in py3k but not 2.7. Is it worth backporting the change?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> pending
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1692335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1693
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Georg: seems like your r55549 and r0 fixed this, am I correct?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1699
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still an issue on Debian and Ubuntu?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, lemburg
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1703
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
How do we find out which versions of optparse and test_optparse jython is
currently using?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1704
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've changed things in reply to msg85311, feel free to alter things again if
you disagree.
--
assignee: -> d...@python
components: +Documentation -Extension Modules, Library (Lib)
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, d...@python
versions: +Python 2.7, Py
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
is this still relevant?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1705
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still relevant given the addition of the ast module in r64064?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1706
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1708652>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Brian/Tim the attached patches have not been applied, what do you make of this
one?
--
components: +Extension Modules -Windows
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, brian.curtin, tim.golden
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I don't think the latest patch has been committed, could someone wave their
magic wand please :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Already fixed by r55549 and r0.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can this be closed due to work on #6267?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1727418>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't believe that this is still relevant.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I think this one line patch still needs applying.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could a Linux guru try to reproduce this with the latest trunk, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1730
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
msg67121 states proposed changes were lost :(
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there any interest in the change proposed here? If not I'll close in a few
weeks time. Note the patch does not include doc or unit test changes.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this something that should be taken up on python-dev?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1736
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there any interest in this or can it be closed as implied in msg52790?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, rhettinger
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1739
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +alanmcintyre
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1742205>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there anyone who'd like to see this functionality exposed who could review
this C code patch?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Brian/Tim any thoughts on this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, brian.curtin, tim.golden
title: Newline skipped in "for line in file" -> Newline skipped in "for line in
file" for huge file
versions: +Python 3.1,
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Given the title, type and severity shouldn't someone take a look at this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we close this as sgmllib only supported htmllib which has been superseded
by HTMLParser?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1745
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Florian this won't go anywhere unles the patch includes doc and unit test
changes.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Doc additions haven't been included with the patches.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> feature request
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can't see much sense in keeping a duplicate open.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
assignee: barry -> d...@python
nosy: +d...@python
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we close this given "This is caused by a bug in BeautifulSoup which was
fixed in version 3.0.5." from msg84412?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> pending
___
Pytho
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Problem confirmed here; thanks for the report.
I think it's also a bug that after:
class A(object):
def __long__(self):
return 42
long(A()) returns an object of type 'int' rather than an object of type 'long'.
It
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Removing 2.6 from the versions, since this isn't a security problem (as far as
I know).
--
versions: -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1777398>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could someone with commit privileges please review the patch with a view to
committing, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, terry.reedy
versions: -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
901 - 1000 of 12207 matches
Mail list logo