[issue44733] Feature request: maxtasksperchild for ProcessPoolExecutor

Gregory P. Smith added the comment: yep, branch off of a recent main. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list U

[issue47156] IDLE: make use of extended SyntaxError info.

Andre Roberge added the comment: > (Anyone really want log of error?) If by this you mean having access to the error from a known place (like sys.last_traceback or something else specific to IDLE but available from a script), then the answer from me is definitely yes. -- nosy: +arob

[issue47151] subprocess fails when used as init, vfork() returns EINVAL if PID=1

Change by Gregory P. Smith : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +30263 stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32186 ___ Python tracker

[issue47151] subprocess fails when used as init, vfork() returns EINVAL if PID=1

Gregory P. Smith added the comment: Any possibility that you can test the attached PR as pid 1? -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pytho

[issue47158] logging.handlers.SysLogHandler doesn't get cleaned up properly on exit if it throws an exception

Grégory Starck added the comment: I think this is fixed in main, thanks to this: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Lib/logging/handlers.py#L862-L863 -- nosy: +gstarck ___ Python tracker ___

[issue44733] Feature request: maxtasksperchild for ProcessPoolExecutor

Change by Logan Jones : -- pull_requests: +30264 stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32187 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue47158] logging.handlers.SysLogHandler doesn't get cleaned up properly on exit if it throws an exception

Enji Cooper added the comment: Yup! Looks like it! Just needs a back port. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing l

[issue47157] bijective invertible map

Jonathan Balloch added the comment: thank you!! On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:44 PM Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > Raymond Hettinger added the comment: > > This is indeed a duplicate. If needed just use one of implementations on > PyPI https://pypi.org/project/bidict/ > > -- > nosy: +rhe

[issue47152] Reorganize the re module sources

Ma Lin added the comment: Please don't merge too close to the 3.11 beta1 release date, I'll submit PRs after this merged. -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue47145] Improve graphlib.TopologicalSort by removing the prepare step

Dennis Sweeney added the comment: Out of curiosity, what are the use cases for adding nodes after get_ready has already produced nodes? I was wondering about avoiding the need to call prepare() by having it automatically do the cycle-checking at the first get_ready() call and then raising V

[issue47145] Improve graphlib.TopologicalSort by removing the prepare step

Dennis Sweeney added the comment: > depends on an already-yielded node I mean "creates a new not-yet-yielded dependency for an already-yielded node". -- ___ Python tracker __

[issue47145] Improve graphlib.TopologicalSort by removing the prepare step

Larry Hastings added the comment: I'm using my graph library to manage a list of tasks that need doing in some sort of proper order. One task may spawn other tasks at runtime, and we don't necessarily know what the tasks will be until runtime. It's way more convenient to simply add such ta

[issue47145] Improve graphlib.TopologicalSort by removing the prepare step

Larry Hastings added the comment: > Assuming we do want to be able to add() after a get_ready(), is there > a reason that "forgetting" already-produced nodes is the correct > behavior, as opposed to remembering all nodes ever added, and > raising iff the addition creates a cycle among all nodes

[issue46864] Deprecate ob_shash in BytesObject

Christian Heimes added the comment: New changeset d8f530fe329c6bd9ad6e1a9db9aa32b465c2d67f by Christian Heimes in branch 'main': bpo-46864: Suppress even more ob_shash deprecation warnings (GH-32176) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d8f530fe329c6bd9ad6e1a9db9aa32b465c2d67f -

<    1   2