On 05.02.2016 16:14, STINNER Victor wrote:
>
> Please don't. I would like to have time to benchmark all these patches (there
> are now 9 patches attached to the issue :-)) and I would like to hear
> Serhiy's feedback on your latest patches.
Regardless of the performance, the fastint5.patch look
On 03.02.2016 18:05, STINNER Victor wrote:
>
>> python -m timeit "sum([x * x * 1 for x in range(100)])"
>
> If you only want to benchmark x*y, x+y and list-comprehension, you
> should use a tuple for the iterator.
... and precalculate that in the setup:
python -m timeit -s "loops=tuple(range(1
