[issue8332] regrtest single TestClass/test_method

R. David Murray added the comment: I'm -1 on your second case. That syntax is too magical, especially since a test method can appear on more than one test case. The additional pattern matching suggestion is more interesting, but it would be necessary to implement that in unittest, since te

[issue8332] regrtest single TestClass/test_method

anatoly techtonik added the comment: Yes. You're missing the second case. In: > regrtest [options] test_file.test_method You don't specify class name. This saves some time you need to navigate and copy/paste name of container class. It will save more time if masks are used by default. To illu

[issue8332] regrtest single TestClass/test_method

Sandro Tosi added the comment: Hello, as explained in msg108109 (of issue9028) you can actually call a single test, or a single TestClass: $ ./python -m unittest test.test_httpservers.BaseHTTPServerTestCase.test_handler . -- R

[issue8332] regrtest single TestClass/test_method

anatoly techtonik added the comment: regrtest [options] test_file.TestClass regrtest [options] test_file.test_method -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue8332] regrtest single TestClass/test_method

New submission from anatoly techtonik : It would be convenient for debug to execute single test_method or TestClass. Running all tests in file can take a long time. -- components: Tests messages: 102524 nosy: techtonik severity: normal status: open title: regrtest single TestClass/test_