[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-08-08 Thread Florent Xicluna
Changes by Florent Xicluna : -- stage: unit test needed -> committed/rejected status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyth

[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-07-21 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: But what if I want to pass a tuple through xmlrpc? The function in the test case: +def execute(server, methodname, *args): +r = getattr(server, methodname)(args) # params become a tuple +return r looks wrong to me. It has th

[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-03-20 Thread Jelly Chen
Jelly Chen added the comment: I know why those two tests run failed, and I found another way to solve the problem, do not make the existing tests broken, and at the same time I have added another test case. I encountered this problem due to a argument is already being a tuple but re-packaged int

[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-02-22 Thread Florent Xicluna
Florent Xicluna added the comment: Attached, the output of the test with "-v test_xmlrpc". -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16308/issue7977_test_xmlrpc.log ___ Python tracker __

[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-02-22 Thread Florent Xicluna
Florent Xicluna added the comment: I didn't look at this issue in details. I'm not a specialist of xmlrpc. But it is unlikely that the patch will be accepted, if it fails the regression tests. Could you investigate this failure and provide a patch which fixes the tests? You could add a specif

[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-02-22 Thread Jelly Chen
Jelly Chen added the comment: Can i have a look at the failure tests? I just check out code at http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/py3k It's very slow. and i'm afraid that i don't know how to run the tests. The tag use improperly is very clear. the wrong case: very ugly, there is

[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-02-22 Thread Florent Xicluna
Florent Xicluna added the comment: The patch causes failures in test_xmlrpc, using Py3k branch. -- nosy: +flox priority: -> normal stage: -> test needed versions: +Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker __

[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-02-22 Thread Jelly Chen
Jelly Chen added the comment: I can't modify the issue. so i replay this email. The old xmlrpc lib don't use surround a param. please take a look at wrong.xml and right.xml. 2010/2/22 Mark Dickinson > > Mark Dickinson added the comment: > > Please could you generate and upload a patch again

[issue7977] I found Python 3.1 xmlrpc lib use "" not properly. and i have fixed it.

2010-02-21 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson added the comment: Please could you generate and upload a patch against the Python source? (For Windows, you can do this using the WinMerge tool, amongst others.) I'm unable to open the file you attached on my machine: """No application knows how to open ... xmlrpc.client.mod