Senthil Kumaran added the comment:
Not actually a bug. The documentation is correct.
Do, random.randint(0,1) a couple of times and you see 1 appearing.
If still not convinced, look into the random.py see that randint(a, b)
actually does a return self.randrange(a, b+1)
--
nosy: +senthil.
New submission from James G. sack (jim) :
Docs for 2.6.2 (http://docs.python.org/library/random.html?
highlight=random#module-random)
presently say
"""
random.randint(a, b)
Return a random integer N such that a <= N <= b.
"""
It should say
...a <= N < b
I wonder if there are other mistakes ther
