[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-10-18 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Sébastien Sablé added the comment: I also believe this patch should be backported. If the issue2643 is not backported, then the patch to apply should be "patch_flush_mmap.diff" instead of "patch_mmap_flush_updated.diff" -- ___ Python tracker

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-10-17 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: Committed to py3k in r85678. If I'm reading this string correctly, I believe this can (and should be) be backported. Am I correct? -- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected ___

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-23 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18957/unnamed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsu

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-23 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18956/unnamed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsu

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-23 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18955/unnamed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsu

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-23 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18954/unnamed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsu

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-23 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18953/unnamed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsu

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-22 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Sébastien Sablé added the comment: After Antoine commit concerning issue2643, here is a new patch (just removing the changes in close). Could you commit it? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18963/patch_mmap_flush_updated.diff ___ Python tr

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg117110 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg117106 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg117107 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg117108 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg117109 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Mark Lawrence
40 Subject: [issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Looks fine to me. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue678250> ___ -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/f

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Mark Lawrence
48 Subject: [issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX Sébastien Sablé added the comment: Would that patch be OK? It solves the test_mmap on AIX. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18951/patch_flush_mmap.diff ___ Python trac

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Mark Lawrence
27 Subject: [issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Interestingly, the matter was discussed on another issue, #2643. I > also agree that ideally flush() should become a no-op (only in 3.2, > since it would break compatibility). But then we should also expos

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Mark Lawrence
19 Subject: [issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Interestingly, the matter was discussed on another issue, #2643. I also agree that ideally flush() should become a no-op (only in 3.2, since it would break compatibility). But then we should also expose a separate syn

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Mark Lawrence
06 Subject: [issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Should flush be modified to do nothing in this case or should the unit test > be >updated? Tim is suggesting that flush should indeed become a noop. Since nobody else speaking in favor of it being an err

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Looks fine to me. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http:

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Sébastien Sablé added the comment: Would that patch be OK? It solves the test_mmap on AIX. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18951/patch_flush_mmap.diff ___ Python tracker ___

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Interestingly, the matter was discussed on another issue, #2643. I > also agree that ideally flush() should become a no-op (only in 3.2, > since it would break compatibility). But then we should also expose a > separate sync() method with the current behaviou

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Interestingly, the matter was discussed on another issue, #2643. I also agree that ideally flush() should become a no-op (only in 3.2, since it would break compatibility). But then we should also expose a separate sync() method with the current behaviour. --

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Should flush be modified to do nothing in this case or should the unit test > be updated? Tim is suggesting that flush should indeed become a noop. Since nobody else speaking in favor of it being an error, I guess this is the way to go: flush, on an ACCESS_

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread R. David Murray
Changes by R. David Murray : -- resolution: out of date -> status: closed -> open ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-21 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Sébastien Sablé added the comment: I would like to reopen this issue as it is still occurring in py3k on AIX 5.3 and 6.1: Re-running test test_mmap in verbose mode test_access_parameter (test.test_mmap.MmapTests) ... ERROR test_anonymous (test.test_mmap.MmapTests) ... ok test_bad_file_desc (te

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-09-14 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Changes by Sébastien Sablé : -- nosy: +sable ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.pytho

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2010-08-18 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Closed as no response to msg81716. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy resolution: -> out of date status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX

2009-02-11 Thread Daniel Diniz
Daniel Diniz added the comment: Is this concern still valid? -- components: +Tests nosy: +ajaksu2 type: -> crash ___ Python tracker ___ ___