[issue6520] urllib.urlopen does not have timeout parameter where as urllib2.urlopen has

2010-08-01 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: Not an issue anymore for Python 3. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: -> out of date status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue6520] urllib.urlopen does not have timeout parameter where as urllib2.urlopen has

2010-05-20 Thread Skip Montanaro
Changes by Skip Montanaro : -- nosy: -skip.montanaro ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mai

[issue6520] urllib.urlopen does not have timeout parameter where as urllib2.urlopen has

2009-07-19 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip Montanaro added the comment: I suspect that was a conscious decision. Back when it was first written urllib2 was supposed to eventually replace urllib I think. Dunno if that's still true, but if so I could see why this feature wasn't added to urllib.urlopen. -- nosy: +skip.montan

[issue6520] urllib.urlopen does not have timeout parameter where as urllib2.urlopen has

2009-07-18 Thread Senthil
New submission from Senthil : Just noticed this while fixing another bug issue5102. Need to figure out why urllib.urlopen does not have timeout in the first account and if it was due to some overlook, then: 1) add timeout parameter to urllib.urlopen 2) propage it across redirects. It may not h