[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Changes by Ronald Oussoren : -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://ma

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: Committed in 74806 (trunk), 74807 (2.6), 74808 (3.x), 74809 (3.1) -- keywords: -needs review, patch resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected type: -> feature request ___ Python tracker

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: I've attached a new patch "arch-intel-v2.patch" that relects my current thinking about this patch. This adds two new options to the "--with-univeral-archs" option for configure: "intel" and "3-way". The former builds a universal binary with the i386 and x86

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Changes by mike bayer : -- nosy: +zzzeek ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Mattias Stahre added the comment: Is there any progress on this? -- nosy: +plux versions: +Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pytho

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Changes by Tarek Ziadé : -- nosy: +tarek ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > FWIW, > it's the --with-universal-archs option that he said wasn't 100% usable, > not the binaries. Ah, ok. That clarifies it. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

John Szakmeister added the comment: I think Ronald is trying to say that a 10.6 SDK is likely not to support building 64-bit binaries at all for the PPC (since there won't be 64-bit versions of the supporting libraries). So you need this patch, if you're going to build against it. I don't thin

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > The details of snow leopard are under NDA, but based on public > information : This is all fine, and really not surprising. My question is: Why is that causing limited usability? I would expect that Snow Leopard just ignores the PPC bits in the universal bi

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: The details of snow leopard are under NDA, but based on public information : * Snow Leopard will only support Intel-based systems * Apple's "rosetta" dynamaic translation subsystem for running PPC code on an intel system only supports 32-bit PPC code. Ther

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: What do you mean by "not 100% usable"? I would hope that a four-way binary still works just fine, no? So what are the restrictions? -- nosy: +loewis ___ Python tracker ___

[issue6245] Add "intel" universal architecture on OSX

New submission from Ronald Oussoren : Apple just announced that MacOSX 10.6 ("Snow Leopard") will be released in September, and will only support intel systems. This means that the --with-universal-archs option is not 100% usable if you want to build a version of Python that specifically targe