[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Éric Araujo added the comment: (Not sure I understand “bleeding requirement”, but I get the gist.) Full compliance with STD 66 is indeed the most desirable goal, thanks for your work in that direction! I just thought that some corner cases were not compliant because of backwards compat (hence t

[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:08:01AM +, Éric Araujo wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. Would it make sense to have either different > functions or a switch to existing ones to tell if we want legacy or > modern parsing? Hard at the moment, or is it a bleed

[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Éric Araujo added the comment: Thanks for the explanation. Would it make sense to have either different functions or a switch to existing ones to tell if we want legacy or modern parsing? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: It was intentional as not to remove the old RFC references because certain parsing behaviours follow them compatibility purposes. If you look at test_urlparse.py you might get the specifics of parsing corresponding a RFC. -- __

[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Éric Araujo added the comment: Hello You’ve added references to current RFCs without removing obsolete ones. Why not remove mention of obsoleted RFCs? Regards -- ___ Python tracker __

[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: Updated in the r80336 through r80339. Thanks for the note, Ezio. -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Ezio Melotti added the comment: The 'See also' in the documentation should also be updated: http://docs.python.org/dev/library/urlparse.html#urlparse.urldefrag -- nosy: +ezio.melotti priority: -> normal status: closed -> open versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0 _

[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: Fixed in revision 80146 and merged into other branches release26-maint: r80147 py3k: r80148 release31-maint: r80149 -- assignee: georg.brandl -> orsenthil resolution: -> fixed stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed __

[issue5650] Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse

Éric Araujo added the comment: See also #2987 -- title: Obsolete RFC's should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse -> Obsolete RFCs should be removed from doc of urllib.urlparse ___ Python tracker __