[issue5360] RO (shorthand for READONLY) gone, not in documentation

2009-02-27 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: Removed RO in r70027. Fixed HEAD_INIT stuff in r70028. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue5360] RO (shorthand for READONLY) gone, not in documentation

2009-02-24 Thread Rémi Koenig
Rémi Koenig added the comment: Sorry to bother, but I just noticed that in this same document (http://docs.python.org/3.0/extending/newtypes.html), PyObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL) has not been replaced by PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL, 0). ___ Python tracker

[issue5360] RO (shorthand for READONLY) gone, not in documentation

2009-02-24 Thread Rémi Koenig
New submission from Rémi Koenig : The Defining New Types document for python3 (http://docs.python.org/3.0/extending/newtypes.html) cites the RO macro (which existed in versions < 3). However, it has been removed in py3k (cf http://wiki.python.org/moin/Py3kExtensionModules or python3.0/structmembe