Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
Here's another example:
py> set([1, 2**63, 4, -5, 6, 5])
{1, 9223372036854775808, 4, 6, 5, -5}
By the way, in the future, please don't post screen shots of text, copy the
code and output and paste it as text into your bug report. Screenshots make it
hard
Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
"Unordered" means that the language doesn't promise any specific order, it
doesn't mean that there is no order at all.
Try strings:
py> set("abcdef")
{'b', 'f', 'c', 'e', 'd', 'a'}
or different ints:
py> set([1, 0, -2])
{0, 1, -2}
--
nosy: +stev
New submission from Piyush Pravin :
In documentation it is written that " Sets are unordered collection", but
actually it is storing the elements in sorted order.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: dndndgndghbdgngdndgngtn.PNG
messages: 376037
nosy: docs@python, p
