[issue40730] Odd sentence in 3.9 What's New

2020-05-22 Thread Eric V. Smith
Eric V. Smith added the comment: Thanks, @DahlitzFlorian! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.10 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue40730] Odd sentence in 3.9 What's New

2020-05-22 Thread Eric V. Smith
Eric V. Smith added the comment: New changeset 983b17ca1319adf9f06d5f2779a44450241eba54 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-40730: Remove redundant 'to' (GH-20316) (GH-20318) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/983b17ca1319adf9f06d5f2779a44450241eba54 -- _

[issue40730] Odd sentence in 3.9 What's New

2020-05-22 Thread miss-islington
Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +19587 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20318 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue40730] Odd sentence in 3.9 What's New

2020-05-22 Thread miss-islington
miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 30d5a7364db9e65ccabbdce2c20b84fe2fb233fb by Florian Dahlitz in branch 'master': bpo-40730: Remove redundant 'to' (GH-20316) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/30d5a7364db9e65ccabbdce2c20b84fe2fb233fb -- nosy: +miss-islington ___

[issue40730] Odd sentence in 3.9 What's New

2020-05-22 Thread Florian Dahlitz
Change by Florian Dahlitz : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +19585 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20316 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue40730] Odd sentence in 3.9 What's New

2020-05-22 Thread Eric V. Smith
Eric V. Smith added the comment: Yes, please go ahead. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: ht

[issue40730] Odd sentence in 3.9 What's New

2020-05-22 Thread Florian Dahlitz
Florian Dahlitz added the comment: Hi @eric.smith. I'm sure the first "to" can be removed. It sounds better this way. Am I free to open a PR? -- nosy: +DahlitzFlorian ___ Python tracker

[issue40730] Odd sentence in 3.9 What's New

2020-05-22 Thread Eric V. Smith
New submission from Eric V. Smith : https://docs.python.org/3.9/whatsnew/3.9.html#optimizations has this sentence: "Unlike to the := operator this idiom does not leak a variable to the outer scope.". I'm not exactly sure what it should be. Probably the first "to" should be deleted? -