[issue37599] Remove a vague statement in documentation of Integer Objects

2019-07-16 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: -Python 3.7, Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue37599] Remove a vague statement in documentation of Integer Objects

2019-07-16 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: New changeset 1d8b04edfdc3030e645730492bfcc27b75718b96 by Raymond Hettinger (sgal) in branch 'master': bpo-37599: Remove a vague statement in documentation of Integer Objects (#14786) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/1d8b04edfdc3030e645730492bfcc27

[issue37599] Remove a vague statement in documentation of Integer Objects

2019-07-16 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: There's nothing wrong with a little wry humor in the docs, especially when the provide a little insight into the implementation. It isn't irresponsible at all -- please avoid those pejoratives. That said, I'll accept the patch because the sentence isn't

[issue37599] Remove a vague statement in documentation of Integer Objects

2019-07-15 Thread sgal
Change by sgal : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +14583 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14786 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue37599] Remove a vague statement in documentation of Integer Objects

2019-07-15 Thread Eric N. Vander Weele
Change by Eric N. Vander Weele : -- nosy: +ericvw ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue37599] Remove a vague statement in documentation of Integer Objects

2019-07-15 Thread sgal
New submission from sgal : In current Python document (3.7 - 3.9) there is such statement in documentation of Integer Objects: The current implementation keeps an array of integer objects for all integers between ``-5`` and ``256``, when you create an int in that range you actually just get