Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
"reversed() built in is not functioning correctly with list" is wrong --
there is no problem with reversed() on lists.
The issue here is that the listreverseiterator has a strange __len__.
Note that other (reverse) iterators have no __len__ at
New submission from Jeff Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
reversed() built in is not functioning correctly with list (specifically
with len() )
l = [1,2,3,4]
rl = reversed(l)
type(rl)
vs. strings and tuples which just return 'reverse' objects
listreverseiterators apparently have a len() defined tha
