[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Changes by Richard Oudkerk : -- stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset c2910971eb86 by Richard Oudkerk in branch 'default': Issue #3518: Remove references to non-existent BaseManager.from_address() http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c2910971eb86 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Pytho

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Changes by R. David Murray : -- assignee: jnoller -> nosy: +sbt versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Changes by Ask Solem : -- nosy: +asksol ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/m

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Changes by Jesse Noller : -- resolution: fixed -> accepted status: closed -> open ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing l

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Casey McGinty added the comment: I would like to open this ticket back up. Python 2.6.2 docs still reference unimplemented 'from_address' method. http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.managers.BaseManager.from_address BaseManager.__reduce__ method also calls unim

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Added the mp.managers shared queue example, fixed the docs in r67419 on trunk. merged to py3k and 2.6.1 maint -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Mart Sõmermaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I propose we add the following to that section as well. If you need to provide access to a queue from both local and remote processes, use `multiprocessing.Queue` in the server: >>> from multiprocessing import Process, Queue >>> from multipro

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Mart Sõmermaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Also, it would be helpful to elaborate a bit more on: major: * how to implement a queue that is shared both locally and remotely (i.e. n local processes access the queue as well as m remote processes) minor: * blocking (assumption: q.get()

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Mart Sõmermaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: The documentation should be amended as follows: Running the following commands creates a server for a single shared queue which remote clients can access: >>> from multiprocessing.managers import BaseManager >>> import Queue >>> queue = Queue

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

New submission from Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The BaseManager.from_address method is documented at: http://docs.python.org/dev/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.ma nagers.BaseManager.from_address but it looks as though this method doesn't actually exist. In contrast, the