[issue3371] 2to3 fails in Python 2.6

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > IOW, this is a duplicate of issue2969. and so it is. Well, it's disabled now, so no point in arguing how. -- resolution: -> duplicate status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTEC

[issue3371] 2to3 fails in Python 2.6

Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > That revision caused the test suite to fail because it caused to be > actually run. :) Right - but now you've disabled the test again, when the original introduction of the resource lib2to3 already had the (desirable) effect of disabling t

[issue3371] 2to3 fails in Python 2.6

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: That revision caused the test suite to fail because it caused to be actually run. :) ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue3371] 2to3 fails in Python 2.6

Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Reverting r64742 would have had the same effect (IMO, it shouldn't have been checked in in the first place, as it causes the test suite to fail). -- nosy: +loewis ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTEC

[issue3371] 2to3 fails in Python 2.6

Changes by Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- title: 2to3 fails in 3.0 -> 2to3 fails in Python 2.6 type: -> crash ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___