Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I've backported the fix to the 2.5 branch. This will go live with the
release of 2.5.3.
For those who do not want to use the released documentation we do offer
the 2.6 documentation under development under http://docs.python.org/dev
-- it is ve
ThomasH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thank you for both of your feedback. I was sure that there is a
release and deployment process in place for the docs. But if the
process doesn't allow links to be fixed on a web page, there is
probably something wrong with it. It's hard to believe yo
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
In addition to what Benjamin said, the Python docs are released together
with the source, so even if the issue was corrected in the 2.5 docs now,
the correction would not show up until 2.5.3 is released, which is not
even planned before 2.6.
__
Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
For Python 2.6 and 3.0, we have transitioned over from LaTex to a new
document format, reST. For this reason, we are not backporting fixes to
the docs. However, when 2.7 and 3.1 become the development focus, we
will again backport fixes. I'
ThomasH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
What? You have fixed it in some development version, and left the
current online version broken? How much can it take to fix a broken link
on a web page? If that's the net effect, I shouldn't have gone through
all the efforts of filing this issue!
R
Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
This has been fixed in the development docs:
http://docs.python.org/dev/install/index.html
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker <[EMA
New submission from ThomasH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The page http://docs.python.org/inst/search-path.html
contains a broken link to site module documentation.
Is: http://www.python.org/doc/devel/lib/module-site.html
Should be: http://docs.python.org/lib/module-site.html
--
assignee: georg.
