[issue31037] Results in section 4.4 break and continue

2017-07-26 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: We just received another report about this on docs@: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2017-July/032314.html -- ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue31037] Results in section 4.4 break and continue

2017-07-25 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Changes by Raymond Hettinger : -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyth

[issue31037] Results in section 4.4 break and continue

2017-07-25 Thread Lisabel Leon
Lisabel Leon added the comment: Thank you Zachary for such a speedy response. I'll paste text next time. Rgds! Lisabel On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Zachary Ware wrote: > > Zachary Ware added the comment: > > Take a look at the statement immediately following the example: > > "(Yes, this

[issue31037] Results in section 4.4 break and continue

2017-07-25 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Take a look at the statement immediately following the example: "(Yes, this is the correct code. Look closely: the else clause belongs to the for loop, not the if statement.)" The example is correct, and is introducing the concept of an 'else' clause on a for l

[issue31037] Results in section 4.4 break and continue

2017-07-25 Thread Stéphane Wirtel
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: could you be more explicit? which section ? Thank you -- nosy: +matrixise ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue31037] Results in section 4.4 break and continue

2017-07-25 Thread Lisabel Leon
New submission from Lisabel Leon: The first example of this section shows different results if typed into the Python interpreter. This is the documentation (documentation.png) and these are the results as I type it into my environment (testresults.jpg). -- assignee: docs@python compon