[issue29979] cgi.parse_multipart is not consistent with FieldStorage

2019-11-17 Thread Martin Panter
Change by Martin Panter : -- nosy: +martin.panter ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue29979] cgi.parse_multipart is not consistent with FieldStorage

2017-05-08 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Changes by Senthil Kumaran : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue29979] cgi.parse_multipart is not consistent with FieldStorage

2017-05-08 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Senthil Kumaran added the comment: New changeset cc3fa204d357be5fafc10eb8c2a80fe0bca998f1 by Senthil Kumaran (Pierre Quentel) in branch 'master': bpo-29979: Rewrite cgi.parse_multipart to make it consistent with FieldStorage (#991) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cc3fa204d357be5fafc10

[issue29979] cgi.parse_multipart is not consistent with FieldStorage

2017-04-11 Thread Pierre Quentel
Pierre Quentel added the comment: Senthil, Can you take a look at the Pull Request when you have time ? The correct PR is #991, not #990. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29979] cgi.parse_multipart is not consistent with FieldStorage

2017-04-04 Thread Pierre Quentel
Changes by Pierre Quentel : -- pull_requests: +1163 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue29979] cgi.parse_multipart is not consistent with FieldStorage

2017-04-04 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Senthil Kumaran added the comment: Looking forward to this. -- assignee: -> orsenthil nosy: +orsenthil ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyt

[issue29979] cgi.parse_multipart is not consistent with FieldStorage

2017-04-04 Thread Pierre Quentel
Changes by Pierre Quentel : -- pull_requests: +1162 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue29979] cgi.parse_multipart is not consistent with FieldStorage

2017-04-04 Thread Pierre Quentel
New submission from Pierre Quentel: In the cgi module, the parse_multipart() function duplicates code from FieldStorage, and the result is not compliant with that of FieldStorage for requests sent with multipart/form-data : for non-file fields, the value associated with a key is a list of *byt