[issue2890] O_ASYNC and FASYNC should be defined if available

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Thanks, applied in r63373. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubs

[issue2890] O_ASYNC and FASYNC should be defined if available

Ismail Donmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Documentation patch is added too. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10344/async-doc.patch __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ __

[issue2890] O_ASYNC and FASYNC should be defined if available

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: That will happen automatically. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list U

[issue2890] O_ASYNC and FASYNC should be defined if available

Ismail Donmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Thanks, can you also apply to py3k branch? :) __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue2890] O_ASYNC and FASYNC should be defined if available

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: OK, committed patch in r63368. Thanks! -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: -> accepted status: open -> closed __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue2890] O_ASYNC and FASYNC should be defined if available

Changes by Ismail Donmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- title: O_ASYNC and FASYNC should be defined for *nix systems -> O_ASYNC and FASYNC should be defined if available __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _