[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: r63767 has the 2.6 changes (with the block in 3.0 in r63768). r63769 has the fixer in 2to3 in the sandbox. Thanks for the patches, Quentin. -- resolution: -> accepted status: open -> closed ___ Py

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Nice patch. Thanks. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mai

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Changes by Quentin Gallet-Gilles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10455/userstring_import_fixer.patch __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ _

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Quentin Gallet-Gilles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Attaching a patch for the deprecation warning in 2.6 of the MutableString class. The import fixer for 2to3 is coming next. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10454/userstring_2.6.patch _

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Yes. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://ma

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Quentin Gallet-Gilles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I only see UserString in the collections module. Has MutableString been removed in 3.0 ? -- nosy: +quentin.gallet-gilles __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: It was moved to the collections module. -- assignee: rhettinger -> brett.cannon __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ _

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Raymond, can you tell me exactly where each module-level thing in UserString went and if it was renamed or not? That way the fixer can get written. -- assignee: -> rhettinger __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTEC

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Is MutableString in the UserString module (and any other class) properly handled in 2.6 for transitioning to 3.0? And there is currently no fixer for UserString (same for UserDict). __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Same questions as for UserDict. Why backport this and break existing 2.5 code? There's no benefit. -- nosy: +rhettinger __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

[issue2877] Backport UserString move from 3.0

New submission from Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The UserString class was moved from its own module to the collections module. That change needs to be backported. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 66901 nosy: brett.cannon priority: release blocker severity: normal status: open