[issue2664] The position of special value tables (cmathmodule.c)

Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I agree that having lines >= 80 characters long is ugly (and violates PEP 7). But I think this particular case falls under the 'rules are made to be broken' comment at the start of PEP 7. I like the fact that if you squint at the tables ha

[issue2664] The position of special value tables (cmathmodule.c)

Hirokazu Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Nope, I don't have strong reason. I just thought exceeding 80 line width is a little ugly, and if data and function are close you can refer both more easily. Please feel free to close this entry as "WONT FIX". _

[issue2664] The position of special value tables (cmathmodule.c)

Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I'm actually pretty happy with the tables the way they are; everything's working at the moment, and the current code seems clear enough. Do you have a strong reason to want this change? __ Tracker <[EMAIL PR

[issue2664] The position of special value tables (cmathmodule.c)

Changes by Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- priority: -> normal __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub

[issue2664] The position of special value tables (cmathmodule.c)

Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- assignee: -> marketdickinson nosy: +marketdickinson __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___

[issue2664] The position of special value tables (cmathmodule.c)

New submission from Hirokazu Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: If putting special value tables near function is preferable, (as before) probably this patch helps. -- components: Extension Modules files: cmathmodule.patch keywords: patch messages: 65657 nosy: ocean-city severity: normal statu