[issue26276] Inconsistent behaviour of PEP 3101 formatting between versions

Eric V. Smith added the comment: I'm going to close this issue. The behavior might be inconsistent with 2.7, but I don't think that matters any more. -- resolution: -> wont fix stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue26276] Inconsistent behaviour of PEP 3101 formatting between versions

Irit Katriel added the comment: Reproduced on 3.11. -- nosy: +iritkatriel versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue26276] Inconsistent behaviour of PEP 3101 formatting between versions

Eric V. Smith added the comment: Hi, Mark. Yes, PEP 3101 is very much under-specified in this area. I tried to avoid the same mistake in PEP 498, although of course that's a different problem area. I don't recall why this particular case broke between 3.2.3 and 3.4.3. I'll try and track it do

[issue26276] Inconsistent behaviour of PEP 3101 formatting between versions

Changes by Eric V. Smith : -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.py

[issue26276] Inconsistent behaviour of PEP 3101 formatting between versions

New submission from Mark Shannon: In Python 2.7.6 and 3.2.3: >>> "{ {{ 0} }}".format(**{' {{ 0} }': 'X'}) 'X' In Python 3.4.3: >>> "{ {{ 0} }}".format(**{' {{ 0} }': 'X'}) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ValueError: unexpected '{' in field name I think the problem is