[issue25623] Keep the link to Python implementation of OrderedDict

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- resolution: -> rejected stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue25623] Keep the link to Python implementation of OrderedDict

Eric Snow added the comment: I agree with Raymond. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://m

[issue25623] Keep the link to Python implementation of OrderedDict

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: > This would have the side-effect of allowing people relying > on the pure Python implementation details to use them Right. That's why we don't want to do this. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue25623] Keep the link to Python implementation of OrderedDict

Emanuel Barry added the comment: I would personally suggest a more permanent and accessible way, in the way the decimal module handles it. I'd add a '_pycollections' module holding the pure Python implementations of OrderedDict and _count_elements, then have the collections package import them

[issue25623] Keep the link to Python implementation of OrderedDict

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I think we should stick with fixing bugs as found (even if that process spills into 3.5.2). The current tests do a good job of making sure the basic functionality is in place and there has been use in the field. Also, you've already done a good job fixing

[issue25623] Keep the link to Python implementation of OrderedDict

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: For now C implementation of OrderedDict totally overrides Python implementation. >>> import collections >>> collections.OrderedDict.__init__ The only way to get Python implementation of Order