[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

Berker Peksag added the comment: Thanks Martin. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: commit review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset bedff93d778d by Berker Peksag in branch '3.5': Issue #24420: Fix documentation regression introduced by f0a00ee094ff. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bedff93d778d New changeset 9b17df697a3c by Berker Peksag in branch 'default': Issue #24420: Fix d

[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

Martin Panter added the comment: New patch dropping the [, input] parameter from the signature. I also removed the bit about *stdout*, since it should be obvious from the equivalent run() call given, and equally applies to *check*. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39831/high-a

[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

Berker Peksag added the comment: LGTM, too. I just left a comment on Rietveld. Thanks! -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

Changes by Martin Panter : -- stage: patch review -> commit review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https:

[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

Thomas Kluyver added the comment: Thanks, this looks good to me. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscri

[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

Changes by Berker Peksag : -- nosy: +berker.peksag stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Un

[issue24420] Documentation regressions from adding subprocess.run()

New submission from Martin Panter: After the documentation was rearranged by Issue 23342 (revision f0a00ee094ff), the “older high-level APIs” lost the paragraphs that said “The arguments shown above are merely the most common ones”. Given the limited signatures of call(), check_call() and chec